Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012

Given the great problem of expansion and poor living conditions of the neighborhoods on the outskirts of Latin American cities, a first quick conclusion could be that there were no sustainability criteria in the Urban and Territorial Planning to control this problem. However, in the case of the city...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: Peralta Arias, José Jorge, Higueras García, Ester
Médium: Online
Jazyk:spa
Vydáno: Universidad de Cuenca 2016
On-line přístup:https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/1020
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-1020
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-10202018-02-06T09:59:23Z Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012 Evaluación sostenible de los Planes Directores de Quito. Periodo 1942-2012 Peralta Arias, José Jorge Higueras García, Ester Given the great problem of expansion and poor living conditions of the neighborhoods on the outskirts of Latin American cities, a first quick conclusion could be that there were no sustainability criteria in the Urban and Territorial Planning to control this problem. However, in the case of the city of Quito (Ecuador), we find six Management Plans from 1942 to 2012, once evaluated, based on sustainability criteria established by J. M. Naredo and J. Fariña in the Sustainability White Paper in Spanish Urban Planning (2010), we concluded that the sustainability criteria have been present and were advanced compared to other Latin American Masters Plans in this period. Quito has maintained interest in being a planned city during its different historical stages of growth, unfortunately the reality is not sustainable, settling the problem on a lack of management plans has not allowed its effectiveness. Now it is necessary that a new vision of the city should incorporate urban management, knowledge of the capacity of the territory, harmonization with the landscape, and the establishment of preventive measures against natural risks and new challenges in the future Master Plans.Keywords: Quito, urban sprawl, master plans, urban policies, sustainable criteria. Ante el gran problema de expansión y las malas condiciones de vida de los barrios de la periferia de las ciudades latinoamericanas, una primera y rápida conclusión podría ser que no han existido criterios de sostenibilidad en el Planeamiento Urbanístico o Territorial que controlara éste problema. Sin embargo, en el caso de la ciudad de Quito (Ecuador), encontramos seis Planes de Ordenación desde 1942 al 2012, que una vez evaluados, a partir de los criterios de sostenibilidad establecidos por José Manuel Naredo y José Fariña en el Libro Blanco de la Sostenibilidad en el Planeamiento Urbanístico Español (2010), se concluye que los criterios de sostenibilidad han estado presentes y eran avanzados con respecto a otros planes reguladores latinoamericanos en este periodo. Quito ha mantenido interés por ser una ciudad planificada durante sus distintas etapas históricas de crecimiento, lamentablemente la realidad no es sostenible, radicándose el problema en una falta de gestión de los planes que no ha permitido su eficacia. Ahora es necesario que una nueva visión de la ciudad incorpore a la gestión urbana, el conocimiento de la capacidad de carga del territorio, la armonización con su paisaje, y el establecimiento de medidas preventivas frente a los riesgos naturales como nuevos retos en los Planes Directores futuros.Palabras clave: Quito, extensión urbana, plan director, políticas urbanas, criterios sostenibles. Universidad de Cuenca 2016-11-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/1020 10.18537/est.v005.n009.03 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Cuenca; Vol. 5 Núm. 9 (2016): Estoa 9 (julio-diciembre 2016); 21-34 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo; Vol. 5 No. 9 (2016): Estoa 9 (julio-diciembre 2016); 21-34 1390-9274 1390-7263 10.18537/est.v005.n009 spa https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/1020/888 Derechos de autor 2017 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Cuenca
institution Universidad de Cuenca
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Peralta Arias, José Jorge
Higueras García, Ester
spellingShingle Peralta Arias, José Jorge
Higueras García, Ester
Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
author_facet Peralta Arias, José Jorge
Higueras García, Ester
author_sort Peralta Arias, José Jorge
title Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
title_short Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
title_full Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
title_fullStr Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012
title_sort sustainable urban evaluation of quito´s master plans. period 1942-2012
description Given the great problem of expansion and poor living conditions of the neighborhoods on the outskirts of Latin American cities, a first quick conclusion could be that there were no sustainability criteria in the Urban and Territorial Planning to control this problem. However, in the case of the city of Quito (Ecuador), we find six Management Plans from 1942 to 2012, once evaluated, based on sustainability criteria established by J. M. Naredo and J. Fariña in the Sustainability White Paper in Spanish Urban Planning (2010), we concluded that the sustainability criteria have been present and were advanced compared to other Latin American Masters Plans in this period. Quito has maintained interest in being a planned city during its different historical stages of growth, unfortunately the reality is not sustainable, settling the problem on a lack of management plans has not allowed its effectiveness. Now it is necessary that a new vision of the city should incorporate urban management, knowledge of the capacity of the territory, harmonization with the landscape, and the establishment of preventive measures against natural risks and new challenges in the future Master Plans.Keywords: Quito, urban sprawl, master plans, urban policies, sustainable criteria.
publisher Universidad de Cuenca
publishDate 2016
url https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/1020
work_keys_str_mv AT peraltaariasjosejorge sustainableurbanevaluationofquitosmasterplansperiod19422012
AT higuerasgarciaester sustainableurbanevaluationofquitosmasterplansperiod19422012
AT peraltaariasjosejorge evaluacionsostenibledelosplanesdirectoresdequitoperiodo19422012
AT higuerasgarciaester evaluacionsostenibledelosplanesdirectoresdequitoperiodo19422012
_version_ 1709550418506285056