Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)

Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)

In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la C...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Autors principals: Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad, Rodríguez, María Florencia, Rodríguez, María Carla, Zapata, María Cecilia
Format: Online
Idioma:spa
Publicat: Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2019
Accés en línia:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-26298
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-262982019-11-08T12:20:30Z Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) Gobernanza neoliberal: una lectura crítica de la política de villas (2015 –2018) Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad Rodríguez, María Florencia Rodríguez, María Carla Zapata, María Cecilia Public policies settlements upgrade governance neoliberalism Buenos Aires city Políticas públicas urbanización de villas gobernanza neoliberalismo ciudad de Buenos Aires In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. The first of that bureaucracies are taking part of the upgrade process of Villa 31-31 bis, the second one of the Villa 20 process, which are the two experiences chosen in the analysis. Both agencies have differences regarding their origin, trajectory, capacities and intervention criteria of upgrade policies, aspects that are reflected in the forms of management that are deployed in the territory. Participation is a transverse axis that shows differences in process and product, within a context of neoliberal governance. The research is based in a qualitative methodology, which combines interview methods, documentary analysis and observations in the different dependencies and the territory. The analysis evidences the complexities that shows de settlements upgrade policy and contributes to the understanding of the new styles of neoliberal governance. Este trabajo reflexiona sobre las distintas modalidades de intervención desplegadas en la política de urbanización de villas por el Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires entre los años 2015 y 2018. Específicamente, retoma la experiencia de la Secretaría de Inclusión Social y Urbana (SISU) y del Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. La primera está abocada a la reurbanización de la villa 31-31bis, mientras que la segunda a la de Villa 20, que son las dos experiencias elegidas en el análisis. Ambas organizaciones presentan diferencias en cuanto a su origen, trayectoria, capacidades y criterios de intervención de las políticas de urbanización, aspectos que se encuentran reflejados en las formas de gestión que desplegaron en el territorio. La participación es un eje transversal que muestra diferencias de proceso y de producto, dentro de un contexto de gobernanza neoliberal. La investigación se sostiene en una metodología cualitativa, que combina métodos de entrevista, análisis documental y observaciones en las distintas dependencias y el territorio. El análisis evidencia las complejidades que presenta la política de villas en la actualidad y aporta a la comprensión de los nuevos estilos de gobernanza neoliberal. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2019-11-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298 PENSUM; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2019); 13-26 2469-0724 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298/33166 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298/28106 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad
Rodríguez, María Florencia
Rodríguez, María Carla
Zapata, María Cecilia
spellingShingle Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad
Rodríguez, María Florencia
Rodríguez, María Carla
Zapata, María Cecilia
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
author_facet Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad
Rodríguez, María Florencia
Rodríguez, María Carla
Zapata, María Cecilia
author_sort Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad
title Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
title_short Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
title_full Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
title_fullStr Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
title_full_unstemmed Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
title_sort neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
description In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. The first of that bureaucracies are taking part of the upgrade process of Villa 31-31 bis, the second one of the Villa 20 process, which are the two experiences chosen in the analysis. Both agencies have differences regarding their origin, trajectory, capacities and intervention criteria of upgrade policies, aspects that are reflected in the forms of management that are deployed in the territory. Participation is a transverse axis that shows differences in process and product, within a context of neoliberal governance. The research is based in a qualitative methodology, which combines interview methods, documentary analysis and observations in the different dependencies and the territory. The analysis evidences the complexities that shows de settlements upgrade policy and contributes to the understanding of the new styles of neoliberal governance.
publisher Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298
work_keys_str_mv AT arquerosmejicamariasoledad neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018
AT rodriguezmariaflorencia neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018
AT rodriguezmariacarla neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018
AT zapatamariacecilia neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018
AT arquerosmejicamariasoledad gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018
AT rodriguezmariaflorencia gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018
AT rodriguezmariacarla gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018
AT zapatamariacecilia gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018
_version_ 1709641147104624640

Ítems similars