Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la C...
保存先:
| 主要な著者: | , , , |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | Online |
| 言語: | spa |
| 出版事項: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
2019
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
| id |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-26298 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-262982019-11-08T12:20:30Z Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) Gobernanza neoliberal: una lectura crítica de la política de villas (2015 –2018) Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad Rodríguez, María Florencia Rodríguez, María Carla Zapata, María Cecilia Public policies settlements upgrade governance neoliberalism Buenos Aires city Políticas públicas urbanización de villas gobernanza neoliberalismo ciudad de Buenos Aires In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. The first of that bureaucracies are taking part of the upgrade process of Villa 31-31 bis, the second one of the Villa 20 process, which are the two experiences chosen in the analysis. Both agencies have differences regarding their origin, trajectory, capacities and intervention criteria of upgrade policies, aspects that are reflected in the forms of management that are deployed in the territory. Participation is a transverse axis that shows differences in process and product, within a context of neoliberal governance. The research is based in a qualitative methodology, which combines interview methods, documentary analysis and observations in the different dependencies and the territory. The analysis evidences the complexities that shows de settlements upgrade policy and contributes to the understanding of the new styles of neoliberal governance. Este trabajo reflexiona sobre las distintas modalidades de intervención desplegadas en la política de urbanización de villas por el Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires entre los años 2015 y 2018. Específicamente, retoma la experiencia de la Secretaría de Inclusión Social y Urbana (SISU) y del Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. La primera está abocada a la reurbanización de la villa 31-31bis, mientras que la segunda a la de Villa 20, que son las dos experiencias elegidas en el análisis. Ambas organizaciones presentan diferencias en cuanto a su origen, trayectoria, capacidades y criterios de intervención de las políticas de urbanización, aspectos que se encuentran reflejados en las formas de gestión que desplegaron en el territorio. La participación es un eje transversal que muestra diferencias de proceso y de producto, dentro de un contexto de gobernanza neoliberal. La investigación se sostiene en una metodología cualitativa, que combina métodos de entrevista, análisis documental y observaciones en las distintas dependencias y el territorio. El análisis evidencia las complejidades que presenta la política de villas en la actualidad y aporta a la comprensión de los nuevos estilos de gobernanza neoliberal. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2019-11-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298 PENSUM; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2019); 13-26 2469-0724 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298/33166 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298/28106 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad Rodríguez, María Florencia Rodríguez, María Carla Zapata, María Cecilia |
| spellingShingle |
Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad Rodríguez, María Florencia Rodríguez, María Carla Zapata, María Cecilia Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| author_facet |
Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad Rodríguez, María Florencia Rodríguez, María Carla Zapata, María Cecilia |
| author_sort |
Arqueros Mejica, María Soledad |
| title |
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| title_short |
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| title_full |
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| title_fullStr |
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| title_sort |
neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018) |
| description |
In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. The first of that bureaucracies are taking part of the upgrade process of Villa 31-31 bis, the second one of the Villa 20 process, which are the two experiences chosen in the analysis. Both agencies have differences regarding their origin, trajectory, capacities and intervention criteria of upgrade policies, aspects that are reflected in the forms of management that are deployed in the territory. Participation is a transverse axis that shows differences in process and product, within a context of neoliberal governance. The research is based in a qualitative methodology, which combines interview methods, documentary analysis and observations in the different dependencies and the territory. The analysis evidences the complexities that shows de settlements upgrade policy and contributes to the understanding of the new styles of neoliberal governance. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT arquerosmejicamariasoledad neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018 AT rodriguezmariaflorencia neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018 AT rodriguezmariacarla neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018 AT zapatamariacecilia neoliberalgovernanceacriticalreviewofvillaspolicy20152018 AT arquerosmejicamariasoledad gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018 AT rodriguezmariaflorencia gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018 AT rodriguezmariacarla gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018 AT zapatamariacecilia gobernanzaneoliberalunalecturacriticadelapoliticadevillas20152018 |
| _version_ |
1709641147104624640 |