SOCIOCULTURAL PERSPECTIVE OF BUILT HERITAGE: ANALYSIS OF COLLECTIVE HOUSING COMPLEXES IN THE CITY OF VALPARAISO, CHILE
This article seeks to contribute to the understanding of key concepts in the processes of heritage declaration, in particular, in the case of modern collective housing, and more specifically from the sociocultural perspective, that is, focusing on the point of view of the communities that live in th...
Đã lưu trong:
| Những tác giả chính: | , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Online |
| Ngôn ngữ: | spa |
| Được phát hành: |
Universidad Diego Portales
2018
|
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://www.revista180.udp.cl/index.php/revista180/article/view/502 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Tóm tắt: | This article seeks to contribute to the understanding of key concepts in the processes of heritage declaration, in particular, in the case of modern collective housing, and more specifically from the sociocultural perspective, that is, focusing on the point of view of the communities that live in these housing complexes. We will study the case of the collective housing in the city of Valparaiso in this research. The methodological approach implies a double perspective: in the first phase, qualitative work is carried out by using individual and collective interview techniques for the purpose of exploring and identifying those heritage attributes that are recognized by the inhabitants of the collective housing complexes and, in the second phase, a quantitative tool is deployed that applies a standardized instrument that allows a descriptive treatment of such attributes. Based on its application, those attributes that are most valued are identified, such as the design, quality, particularity and location of the housing complex. The article raises some conclusions that argue about the relevance of highlighting the perception and practices of the inhabitants in approaching collective housing complexes from a heritage perspective. In doing so, an important tension between material and immaterial dimensions of the heritage emerges, determining the pertinence of mechanisms —such as those suggested by this work— of heritage evaluation that incorporate the perspective of the inhabitants. |
|---|