The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911)
In his first novel, the trilogy The Sleepwalkers, published between 1930 and 1932, the Austrian writer Hermann Broch –one of the greatest representatives of the critical literature of the Fin-de-Siècle Vienna together with Robert Musil and Joseph Roth – introduced in the middle of the plot long essa...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Online |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
Unisinos
2014
|
| 在線閱讀: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/arq.2014.101.05 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| id |
oai:ojs.www.unisinos.br:article-3979 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.www.unisinos.br:article-39792021-08-30T19:09:20Z The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) La muerte del ornamento según Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) Caralt, David In his first novel, the trilogy The Sleepwalkers, published between 1930 and 1932, the Austrian writer Hermann Broch –one of the greatest representatives of the critical literature of the Fin-de-Siècle Vienna together with Robert Musil and Joseph Roth – introduced in the middle of the plot long essayistic digressions that start with a discourse on architectural ornament. For Broch, the singularity of his present lay in “the fact that an epoch captive to death and hell has to live within a style incapable of producing the Ornamental”. Broch’s ornament theory, in open opposition to that of Adolf Loos, comes from the writer’s early aesthetic concerns, formulated just when the controversy around the Looshaus in Vienna’s Michaelerplatz erupted towards 1910.Keywords: Hermann Broch, ornament, Style, Adolf Loos, Vienna School of Art History. En su primera novela, la trilogía Los sonámbulos, publicada entre 1930 y 1932, el escritor austríaco Hermann Broch –uno de los mayores representantes de la literatura crítica de la Viena finisecular junto a Robert Musil y Joseph Roth– introdujo en medio de la trama largos excursos ensayísticos que arrancan con un discurso sobre el ornamento arquitectónico. Para Broch, la singularidad de su presente radicaba en “el hecho de que una época prisionera de la muerte y del infierno tenga que vivir dentro de un estilo incapaz de producir lo ornamental”. La teoría brochiana del ornamento, en abierta oposición a la de Adolf Loos, proviene de las primeras preocupaciones estéticas del escritor, formuladas justo cuando estalló la polémica de la Looshaus en la Michaelerplatz de Viena hacia 1910.Palabras clave: Hermann Broch, ornamento, estilo, Adolf Loos, Escuela de Viena. Unisinos 2014-08-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/arq.2014.101.05 10.4013/arq.2014.101.05 Arquitetura Revista; v. 10 n. 1 (2014): Jan-Jun; 37-44 1808-5741 spa https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/arq.2014.101.05/4162 |
| institution |
Universidad de Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Caralt, David |
| spellingShingle |
Caralt, David The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| author_facet |
Caralt, David |
| author_sort |
Caralt, David |
| title |
The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| title_short |
The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| title_full |
The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| title_fullStr |
The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The death of ornament according to Hermann Broch (ca. 1911) |
| title_sort |
death of ornament according to hermann broch (ca. 1911) |
| description |
In his first novel, the trilogy The Sleepwalkers, published between 1930 and 1932, the Austrian writer Hermann Broch –one of the greatest representatives of the critical literature of the Fin-de-Siècle Vienna together with Robert Musil and Joseph Roth – introduced in the middle of the plot long essayistic digressions that start with a discourse on architectural ornament. For Broch, the singularity of his present lay in “the fact that an epoch captive to death and hell has to live within a style incapable of producing the Ornamental”. Broch’s ornament theory, in open opposition to that of Adolf Loos, comes from the writer’s early aesthetic concerns, formulated just when the controversy around the Looshaus in Vienna’s Michaelerplatz erupted towards 1910.Keywords: Hermann Broch, ornament, Style, Adolf Loos, Vienna School of Art History. |
| publisher |
Unisinos |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/arq.2014.101.05 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT caraltdavid thedeathofornamentaccordingtohermannbrochca1911 AT caraltdavid lamuertedelornamentosegunhermannbrochca1911 AT caraltdavid deathofornamentaccordingtohermannbrochca1911 |
| _version_ |
1709545722720813056 |