Lighting preferences in individual offices
Workplaces with good daylighting offer visual comfort to users, give them a series of physiological and psychological benefits and allow good performance of visual activities, besides saving energy. However, this solution is not always adopted: lighting type preferences involve many variables beside...
保存先:
| 主要な著者: | , , |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | Online |
| 言語: | por |
| 出版事項: |
ANTAC - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído
2016
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/view/62837 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
| id |
ojs-article-62837 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
ojs-article-628372016-12-19T13:54:12Z Lighting preferences in individual offices Faria, João Roberto Gomes de Inskava, Aline Yurika Planitzer, Sven Thomas daylighting; lighting preferences; individual office; computing simulation Workplaces with good daylighting offer visual comfort to users, give them a series of physiological and psychological benefits and allow good performance of visual activities, besides saving energy. However, this solution is not always adopted: lighting type preferences involve many variables besides the availability of daylight. This paper explores a case study through the analysis of questionnaire answers and computer simulations of a series of metrics related to quality of lighting with the aim of finding explanations for the lighting preferences of individual office users. The results show that, although the offices present good daylighting conditions and no glare potential, and users are satisfied with daylighting, these parameters are not sufficient to explain the predominant lighting preferences. The findings have also shown that there is no consensus about which parameters potentially cause visual comfort, while the parameters that cause discomfort are clearly identified. In addition, in this study, 49% of the preference for mixed lighting (daylight plus electrical light) can be explained by the fact that mixed lighting produces better modeling than daylighting alone. ANTAC - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído CNPq 2016-12-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/view/62837 Ambiente Construído; v. 17, n. 1 (2017); 39-53 Ambiente Construído; v. 17, n. 1 (2017); 39-53 Ambiente Construído; v. 17, n. 1 (2017); 39-53 1678-8621 1415-8876 por https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/view/62837/39320 https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/downloadSuppFile/62837/36000 Direitos autorais 2016 Ambiente Construído https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
por |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Faria, João Roberto Gomes de Inskava, Aline Yurika Planitzer, Sven Thomas |
| spellingShingle |
Faria, João Roberto Gomes de Inskava, Aline Yurika Planitzer, Sven Thomas Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| author_facet |
Faria, João Roberto Gomes de Inskava, Aline Yurika Planitzer, Sven Thomas |
| author_sort |
Faria, João Roberto Gomes de |
| title |
Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| title_short |
Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| title_full |
Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| title_fullStr |
Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Lighting preferences in individual offices |
| title_sort |
lighting preferences in individual offices |
| description |
Workplaces with good daylighting offer visual comfort to users, give them a series of physiological and psychological benefits and allow good performance of visual activities, besides saving energy. However, this solution is not always adopted: lighting type preferences involve many variables besides the availability of daylight. This paper explores a case study through the analysis of questionnaire answers and computer simulations of a series of metrics related to quality of lighting with the aim of finding explanations for the lighting preferences of individual office users. The results show that, although the offices present good daylighting conditions and no glare potential, and users are satisfied with daylighting, these parameters are not sufficient to explain the predominant lighting preferences. The findings have also shown that there is no consensus about which parameters potentially cause visual comfort, while the parameters that cause discomfort are clearly identified. In addition, in this study, 49% of the preference for mixed lighting (daylight plus electrical light) can be explained by the fact that mixed lighting produces better modeling than daylighting alone. |
| publisher |
ANTAC - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/view/62837 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT fariajoaorobertogomesde lightingpreferencesinindividualoffices AT inskavaalineyurika lightingpreferencesinindividualoffices AT planitzersventhomas lightingpreferencesinindividualoffices |
| _version_ |
1709370656506773504 |