Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo

Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo

The following article exposes how the implementation of the Inclusionary Zoning took place both in cities of the United States of America and São Paulo. By this article hopes to demonstrate the differences and the similarities between the american inclusionary zoning programs, active since the 1970s...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
Main Authors: Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti, Costa, Ana Beatriz Pahor Pereira da, Rampazio, Luiz Filipe
格式: Online
语言:por
出版: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015
在线阅读:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8635024
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
id oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article-8635024
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article-86350242019-06-17T15:20:38Z Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo Cota de solidariedade: comparando políticas entre cidades Norte Americanas e São Paulo Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti Costa, Ana Beatriz Pahor Pereira da Rampazio, Luiz Filipe Inclusionary zoning. Affordable housing. Master planning. Cota de solidariedade. Habitação social. Plano diretor. The following article exposes how the implementation of the Inclusionary Zoning took place both in cities of the United States of America and São Paulo. By this article hopes to demonstrate the differences and the similarities between the american inclusionary zoning programs, active since the 1970s’, and the recent implementation of the Cota de Solidariedade tool in São Pauloin the city’s master plan approved on July 31, 2014. There was also an effort put into understanding the success and the failures of strategies and the characteristics that made some programs more successful than others, through the analysis of amercian historical of facing the matter, studies about programs of a few american cities and about São Paulo’s law. Understanding that the efficiency of urbanistic tools is mostly subordinated to the interest of specific groups in the brazilian antagonic urban scenario, this article aims for a critical and constructive analysis of the incorporation of the Cota de Solidariedade into the city's master plan, by studiying the decisions made in the implementation of this tool and it's likely sucesses and failures in São Paulo's application, with results to be seen in the next few years.  O seguinte artigo expõe como se deu a implementação do instrumento de Cota de Solidariedade tanto nas cidades dos Estados Unidos da América quanto em São Paulo. Por meio deste artigo procura-se demonstrar as diferenças e similaridades entre os programas de Inclusionary Zoning americanos, vigentes desde a década de 1970, e a recente aplicação do instrumento da Cota de Solidariedade em São Paulo por meio do Plano Diretor da cidade aprovado em Julho de 2014. Buscou-se também entender os sucessos e falhas das estratégias, e as características que tornaram algumas experiências mais eficazes do que outras, através de analises do histórico americano de enfrentamento da questão, de estudos sobre determinados planos de algumas cidades americanas e da elaboração da lei paulistana. Entendendo o quadro urbano brasileiro como um cenário antagônico, em que a efetividade dos instrumentos urbanísticos muitas vezes fica subordinada aos interesses da sociedade de elite, o artigo busca uma análise crítica e construtiva da incorporação da Cota de Solidariedade ao novo Plano Diretor, através das experiências estudadas, das repercussões da lei, da avaliação das posições tomadas na implantação desse instrumento e seus possíveis sucessos e falhas na aplicação paulistana, cujos resultados serão concretos nos anos que virão.  Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015-03-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo Field Study application/pdf https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8635024 10.20396/parc.v6i1.8635024 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015); 56-68 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2015); 56-68 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; v. 6 n. 1 (2015); 56-68 1980-6809 por https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8635024/4270 Copyright (c) 2018 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção
institution Universidade Estadual de Campinas
collection OJS
language por
format Online
author Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti
Costa, Ana Beatriz Pahor Pereira da
Rampazio, Luiz Filipe
spellingShingle Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti
Costa, Ana Beatriz Pahor Pereira da
Rampazio, Luiz Filipe
Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
author_facet Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti
Costa, Ana Beatriz Pahor Pereira da
Rampazio, Luiz Filipe
author_sort Albuquerque, Giovanna Helena Benedetti
title Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
title_short Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
title_full Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
title_fullStr Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
title_full_unstemmed Inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from United States cities and São Paulo
title_sort inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from united states cities and são paulo
description The following article exposes how the implementation of the Inclusionary Zoning took place both in cities of the United States of America and São Paulo. By this article hopes to demonstrate the differences and the similarities between the american inclusionary zoning programs, active since the 1970s’, and the recent implementation of the Cota de Solidariedade tool in São Pauloin the city’s master plan approved on July 31, 2014. There was also an effort put into understanding the success and the failures of strategies and the characteristics that made some programs more successful than others, through the analysis of amercian historical of facing the matter, studies about programs of a few american cities and about São Paulo’s law. Understanding that the efficiency of urbanistic tools is mostly subordinated to the interest of specific groups in the brazilian antagonic urban scenario, this article aims for a critical and constructive analysis of the incorporation of the Cota de Solidariedade into the city's master plan, by studiying the decisions made in the implementation of this tool and it's likely sucesses and failures in São Paulo's application, with results to be seen in the next few years. 
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publishDate 2015
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8635024
work_keys_str_mv AT albuquerquegiovannahelenabenedetti inclusionaryzoningcomparingpoliciesfromunitedstatescitiesandsaopaulo
AT costaanabeatrizpahorpereirada inclusionaryzoningcomparingpoliciesfromunitedstatescitiesandsaopaulo
AT rampazioluizfilipe inclusionaryzoningcomparingpoliciesfromunitedstatescitiesandsaopaulo
AT albuquerquegiovannahelenabenedetti cotadesolidariedadecomparandopoliticasentrecidadesnorteamericanasesaopaulo
AT costaanabeatrizpahorpereirada cotadesolidariedadecomparandopoliticasentrecidadesnorteamericanasesaopaulo
AT rampazioluizfilipe cotadesolidariedadecomparandopoliticasentrecidadesnorteamericanasesaopaulo
_version_ 1709640955395571712

相似书籍