ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?

Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relations...

Popoln opis

Shranjeno v:

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Glavni avtor:	Fonti, Diego
Format:	Online
Jezik:	spa
Izdano:	Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2017
Online dostop:	https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013
Oznake:	Označite Brez oznak, prvi označite!

id	oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-19013
record_format	ojs
spelling	oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-190132019-11-04T16:32:56Z ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK? Arquitectura y escritura Acerca de la pregunta ¿por qué escribir es parte del trabajo arquitectónico? Fonti, Diego Escritura Arquitectura Legitimidad Crítica Writing Architecture Legitimacy Critique Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed Recientes textos publicados por profesionales de la arquitectura en el contexto de Córdoba permiten una reflexión sobre la relación de la escritura con la arquitectura. En primer lugar, este artículo ofrece una reconstrucción hermenéutica de ambos términos, encontrando en el significante “texto” un punto de partida para su vinculación. A continuación, se identifican tres modelos históricamente influyentes de escritura sobre la arquitectura: el dentologismo clasicista, el deontologismo pragmatista y la tradición crítica. Luego de analizar la estructura e ideas rectoras de cada uno de ellos, se indagan los núcleos más significativos de la escritura de arquitectos y arquitectas de nuestro medio, identificando cinco núcleos temáticos transversales: modernidad, ciudad, pedagogía estética y subjetividad. Estos núcleos representan, al mismo tiempo, una recepción y un intento de superación de los modelos expuestos Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2017-12-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013 PENSUM; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2017) 2469-0724 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013/18931 Derechos de autor 2017 Diego Fonti
institution	Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
collection	OJS
language	spa
format	Online
author	Fonti, Diego
spellingShingle	Fonti, Diego ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
author_facet	Fonti, Diego
author_sort	Fonti, Diego
title	ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_short	ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_full	ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_fullStr	ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_full_unstemmed	ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_sort	architecture and writing about the question, why is writing part of architectural work?
description	Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed
publisher	Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
publishDate	2017
url	https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013
work_keys_str_mv	AT fontidiego architectureandwritingaboutthequestionwhyiswritingpartofarchitecturalwork AT fontidiego arquitecturayescrituraacercadelapreguntaporqueescribirespartedeltrabajoarquitectonico
_version_	1709641144732745728

ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?

Podobne knjige/članki