Neoliberal governance: a critical review of villas policy (2015 - 2018)
In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la C...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/26298 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | In this paper we reflect on the different modalities of intervention deployed in settlements upgrade policy by the Government in Buenos Aires city between 2015 and 2018. Specifically, it focuses on the experience of the Secretaría de Inclusión social y Urbana and the Instituto de la Vivienda de la Ciudad. The first of that bureaucracies are taking part of the upgrade process of Villa 31-31 bis, the second one of the Villa 20 process, which are the two experiences chosen in the analysis. Both agencies have differences regarding their origin, trajectory, capacities and intervention criteria of upgrade policies, aspects that are reflected in the forms of management that are deployed in the territory. Participation is a transverse axis that shows differences in process and product, within a context of neoliberal governance. The research is based in a qualitative methodology, which combines interview methods, documentary analysis and observations in the different dependencies and the territory. The analysis evidences the complexities that shows de settlements upgrade policy and contributes to the understanding of the new styles of neoliberal governance. |
|---|