Mies: a Fighter for Film

At the beginning of 1931, a short article entitled “Film fighter from the outside” appeared in the industry magazine Film-Kurier. In the introductory sentence, the author, who remains anonymous, asks: “How does Mies van der Rohe come to film? - Not a difficult question to answer: As a person who tak...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
מחבר ראשי: Robbers, Lutz
פורמט: Online
שפה:spa
יצא לאור: Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2019
גישה מקוונת:https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/69445
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-69445
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-694452020-07-29T22:25:13Z Mies: a Fighter for Film Mies: A Fighter for Film Robbers, Lutz At the beginning of 1931, a short article entitled “Film fighter from the outside” appeared in the industry magazine Film-Kurier. In the introductory sentence, the author, who remains anonymous, asks: “How does Mies van der Rohe come to film? - Not a difficult question to answer: As a person who takes a stand on the spiritual things of the time, he naturally also addresses questions of film.” But the article neither explains what Mies’s involvement with film was, nor how the architect and then Bauhaus director became interested in film. And even today the assumption of an affinity between Mies and film is anything but self-explanatory. Neither the research on Mies, nor the field of research of ‘architecture and film’ covered by architecture theorists and film scholars has so far dealt in detail with the question of a possible relationship between Mies and the new visual medium. This shortcoming can be explained above all by the fact that his buildings, drawings and published writings do not contain any direct references to film. Although he apparently was a regular moviegoer, Mies built neither cinema theaters nor film sets. Nor did he take part in film productions or wrote movie scripts. This is exactly what many other representatives of the avant-garde did in the 1920s: Hans Poelzig and Robert Mallet-Stevens designed film sets, Bruno Taut integrated film projectors into some of his buildings, built innovative “daylight cinemas”, patented a vertical cinema for reclining viewers, and wrote screenplays; Le Corbusier used film as a propaganda tool to spread his architectural and urban planning ideas. Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2019-05-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Investigación application/pdf application/xml https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/69445 10.22201/fa.14058901p.2019.40.69445 Bitacora Arquitectura; No. 40 (2018): Film and Architecture; 48-57 Bitácora Arquitectura; Núm. 40 (2018): Cine y arquitectura; 48-57 2594-0856 1405-8901 10.22201/fa.14058901p.2019.40 spa https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/69445/61471 https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/69445/67518 Derechos de autor 2019 Bitácora arquitectura
institution Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Robbers, Lutz
spellingShingle Robbers, Lutz
Mies: a Fighter for Film
author_facet Robbers, Lutz
author_sort Robbers, Lutz
title Mies: a Fighter for Film
title_short Mies: a Fighter for Film
title_full Mies: a Fighter for Film
title_fullStr Mies: a Fighter for Film
title_full_unstemmed Mies: a Fighter for Film
title_sort mies: a fighter for film
description At the beginning of 1931, a short article entitled “Film fighter from the outside” appeared in the industry magazine Film-Kurier. In the introductory sentence, the author, who remains anonymous, asks: “How does Mies van der Rohe come to film? - Not a difficult question to answer: As a person who takes a stand on the spiritual things of the time, he naturally also addresses questions of film.” But the article neither explains what Mies’s involvement with film was, nor how the architect and then Bauhaus director became interested in film. And even today the assumption of an affinity between Mies and film is anything but self-explanatory. Neither the research on Mies, nor the field of research of ‘architecture and film’ covered by architecture theorists and film scholars has so far dealt in detail with the question of a possible relationship between Mies and the new visual medium. This shortcoming can be explained above all by the fact that his buildings, drawings and published writings do not contain any direct references to film. Although he apparently was a regular moviegoer, Mies built neither cinema theaters nor film sets. Nor did he take part in film productions or wrote movie scripts. This is exactly what many other representatives of the avant-garde did in the 1920s: Hans Poelzig and Robert Mallet-Stevens designed film sets, Bruno Taut integrated film projectors into some of his buildings, built innovative “daylight cinemas”, patented a vertical cinema for reclining viewers, and wrote screenplays; Le Corbusier used film as a propaganda tool to spread his architectural and urban planning ideas.
publisher Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
publishDate 2019
url https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/69445
work_keys_str_mv AT robberslutz miesafighterforfilm
_version_ 1817362181097783296