New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito
Is the contemporary city like the contemporary airport- “all the same”? This hypothesis in "The Generic City" (Koolhaas, 1997) is even more controversial with the following scenario: what happens when a territory is planned based on an airport, a "non-place", as qualified by Marc...
Saved in:
Hovedforfatter: | |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Sprog: | spa |
Udgivet: |
Universidad de Cuenca
2015
|
Online adgang: | https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/837 |
Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
id |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-837 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article-8372018-02-06T10:00:40Z New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito Nuevas formas de habitar la ciudad: Aerotrópolis y Ciudad Genérica. El caso de Quito Rosero Añazco, Verónica Is the contemporary city like the contemporary airport- “all the same”? This hypothesis in "The Generic City" (Koolhaas, 1997) is even more controversial with the following scenario: what happens when a territory is planned based on an airport, a "non-place", as qualified by Marc Augé? (Augé, 1993) The "aerotropolis" is an urban model that has been applied in various cities around the world in general terms, despite the obvious differences that may exist in cultural, geographical, economic, idiosyncratic, and sociopolitical aspects. John Kasarda, author of the concept of aerotropolis (Kasarda, 2000), argues that although their basic planning principles can be applied to most places, the successful implementation of an aerotropolis relies strongly on local factors. Can the airport and its affected territory reach a symbiotic integration, where the first one contributes with an economic capital and the second one with the identity? Through the case of the New Quito International Airport, we reflect on this dispute through a critical analysis of its territory. Strategies like the contrast with the Greek polis, or the approach to intelligent territories, provide lights to the debate on this new form of living and planning the city.Keywords: aerotropolis, generic city, Quito, smart territory. Son las ciudades contemporáneas igual que los aeropuertos? ¿Es decir, todas iguales? Esta hipótesis planteada en La Ciudad Genérica (Koolhaas, 1997) es aún más controversial: ¿qué pasa cuando un territorio es planificado en función de un aeropuerto, un “no-lugar”? como lo califica Marc Augé? (1993). La aerotrópolis es un modelo urbano aplicado en diversas ciudades del mundo de manera genérica, pese a las diferencias geográficas, culturales, económicas, idiosincráticas y sociopolíticas. John Kasarda, autor del concepto de aerotrópolis (2000), argumenta que aunque sus principios básicos de planificación se pueden aplicar a la mayoría de los lugares, su implantación exitosa depende mucho de los factores locales. ¿Pueden llegar el aeropuerto y el territorio afectado a una integración simbiótica en la que el primero aporte capital económico y el segundo identidad? A través del caso del nuevo aeropuerto internacional de Quito se reflexiona sobre esta controversia mediante un análisis crítico de su territorio. Estrategias como la contrastación con la polis griega, o el planteamiento de territorios inteligentes aportan luces al debate sobre esta nueva formar de habitar y planificar la ciudad.Palabras clave: aerotrópolis, ciudad genérica, Quito, territorio inteligente. Universidad de Cuenca 2015-06-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/837 10.18537/est.v004.n007.03 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Cuenca; Vol. 4 Núm. 7 (2015): Estoa 7 (julio-diciembre 2015); 15-25 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2015): Estoa 7 (julio-diciembre 2015); 15-25 1390-9274 1390-7263 10.18537/est.v004.n007 spa https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/837/912 Derechos de autor 2017 Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Cuenca |
institution |
Universidad de Cuenca |
collection |
OJS |
language |
spa |
format |
Online |
author |
Rosero Añazco, Verónica |
spellingShingle |
Rosero Añazco, Verónica New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
author_facet |
Rosero Añazco, Verónica |
author_sort |
Rosero Añazco, Verónica |
title |
New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
title_short |
New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
title_full |
New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
title_fullStr |
New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
title_full_unstemmed |
New ways of inhabiting the city: Aerotropolis and Generic City. The case of Quito |
title_sort |
new ways of inhabiting the city: aerotropolis and generic city. the case of quito |
description |
Is the contemporary city like the contemporary airport- “all the same”? This hypothesis in "The Generic City" (Koolhaas, 1997) is even more controversial with the following scenario: what happens when a territory is planned based on an airport, a "non-place", as qualified by Marc Augé? (Augé, 1993) The "aerotropolis" is an urban model that has been applied in various cities around the world in general terms, despite the obvious differences that may exist in cultural, geographical, economic, idiosyncratic, and sociopolitical aspects. John Kasarda, author of the concept of aerotropolis (Kasarda, 2000), argues that although their basic planning principles can be applied to most places, the successful implementation of an aerotropolis relies strongly on local factors. Can the airport and its affected territory reach a symbiotic integration, where the first one contributes with an economic capital and the second one with the identity? Through the case of the New Quito International Airport, we reflect on this dispute through a critical analysis of its territory. Strategies like the contrast with the Greek polis, or the approach to intelligent territories, provide lights to the debate on this new form of living and planning the city.Keywords: aerotropolis, generic city, Quito, smart territory. |
publisher |
Universidad de Cuenca |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/estoa/article/view/837 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roseroanazcoveronica newwaysofinhabitingthecityaerotropolisandgenericcitythecaseofquito AT roseroanazcoveronica nuevasformasdehabitarlaciudadaerotropolisyciudadgenericaelcasodequito |
_version_ |
1709550426584514560 |