Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual

 The purpose of this analysis is to establish a correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD, 2005). Its importance lies in the fact that, although among academics and professionals design...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: Gómez-González, Carolina, Lecuona López, Manuel, Hernandez Monsalve, Maria Cristina
フォーマット: Online
言語:spa
出版事項: Universidad Diego Portales 2018
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.revista180.udp.cl/index.php/revista180/article/view/359
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
id oai:ojs.revista180.cl:article-359
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Diego Portales
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Gómez-González, Carolina
Lecuona López, Manuel
Hernandez Monsalve, Maria Cristina
spellingShingle Gómez-González, Carolina
Lecuona López, Manuel
Hernandez Monsalve, Maria Cristina
Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
author_facet Gómez-González, Carolina
Lecuona López, Manuel
Hernandez Monsalve, Maria Cristina
author_sort Gómez-González, Carolina
title Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
title_short Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
title_full Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
title_fullStr Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
title_full_unstemmed Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual
title_sort correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the oslo manual
description  The purpose of this analysis is to establish a correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD, 2005). Its importance lies in the fact that, although among academics and professionals design has been recognized as an engine of economic development at both micro and macro levels, it is not recognized by policymakers; which implies that innovation policies are an established academic field while design policies remain as an emerging one. This study includes the analysis of six design policies from European countries or regions, which led to the identification of different strategies that are influenced by infrastructure and institutional framework, design promotion, education systems, etc. Those strategies were categorized into twelve groups using methodologies of qualitative content analysis. Afterwards, a SWOT analysis developed for each of the twelve categories allowed to established a relation between them and the stakeholders of the Oslo Manual’s framework, in addition to the possibility to compare its implementation in each of the six-analyzed countries or regions. This graphical correlation showed that the existing links between the stakeholders of the system are the same links that exist between categories; therefore, the strategies of the different categories reinforce the links and ties between the different stakeholders of a system of Innovation from a country/region.  This methodology can be adapted to analyze the design policy of any region.Replicate the results of this research would enable to standardize Latin American design policies in a global context by allowing them to be compared with systems from leading countries. 
publisher Universidad Diego Portales
publishDate 2018
url https://www.revista180.udp.cl/index.php/revista180/article/view/359
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezgonzalezcarolina correspondenceofdesignpolicieswiththeinnovationmeasurementframeworkoftheoslomanual
AT lecuonalopezmanuel correspondenceofdesignpolicieswiththeinnovationmeasurementframeworkoftheoslomanual
AT hernandezmonsalvemariacristina correspondenceofdesignpolicieswiththeinnovationmeasurementframeworkoftheoslomanual
AT gomezgonzalezcarolina concordanciadelaspoliticasdedisenoconelmarcodemediciondelainnovaciondelmanualdeoslo
AT lecuonalopezmanuel concordanciadelaspoliticasdedisenoconelmarcodemediciondelainnovaciondelmanualdeoslo
AT hernandezmonsalvemariacristina concordanciadelaspoliticasdedisenoconelmarcodemediciondelainnovaciondelmanualdeoslo
_version_ 1709644659257507840
spelling oai:ojs.revista180.cl:article-3592018-11-20T14:17:36Z Correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual Concordancia de las políticas de diseño con el marco de medición de la innovación del Manual de Oslo Gómez-González, Carolina Lecuona López, Manuel Hernandez Monsalve, Maria Cristina design policies; design promotion; design system; innovation policies; Oslo Manual diseño; gestión de diseño; políticas de diseño Manual de Oslo; políticas de diseño; políticas de innovación; promoción de diseño; sistema de diseño  The purpose of this analysis is to establish a correspondence of design policies with the innovation measurement framework of the Oslo Manual(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD, 2005). Its importance lies in the fact that, although among academics and professionals design has been recognized as an engine of economic development at both micro and macro levels, it is not recognized by policymakers; which implies that innovation policies are an established academic field while design policies remain as an emerging one. This study includes the analysis of six design policies from European countries or regions, which led to the identification of different strategies that are influenced by infrastructure and institutional framework, design promotion, education systems, etc. Those strategies were categorized into twelve groups using methodologies of qualitative content analysis. Afterwards, a SWOT analysis developed for each of the twelve categories allowed to established a relation between them and the stakeholders of the Oslo Manual’s framework, in addition to the possibility to compare its implementation in each of the six-analyzed countries or regions. This graphical correlation showed that the existing links between the stakeholders of the system are the same links that exist between categories; therefore, the strategies of the different categories reinforce the links and ties between the different stakeholders of a system of Innovation from a country/region.  This methodology can be adapted to analyze the design policy of any region.Replicate the results of this research would enable to standardize Latin American design policies in a global context by allowing them to be compared with systems from leading countries.  El propósito de este análisis es relacionar el marco de la medición de la innovación del Manual de Oslo(Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos, OECD 2005) con las políticas de diseño. Su importancia radica en que, si bien el diseño ha sido reconocido como motor de desarrollo económico, tanto a nivel micro como macro, entre los académicos y profesionales, no lo es por los creadores de políticas. Lo anterior conlleva a que las políticas de innovación sean una línea académica establecida, mientras que las políticas de diseño sean un campo académico emergente.Para este artículo se analizaron seis políticas de diseño de regiones o países europeos, en las cuales se identificaron estrategias en las que influyen lineamientos de gobierno e instituciones, infraestructuras, promoción de diseño, sistemas educativos, etc. Estas fueron clasificadas en doce categorías, siguiendo metodologías de análisis de contenido cualitativo.Posteriormente, para cada una de las doce categorías se realizó una matriz DOFA, lo que permitió evidenciar la relación de estas con los diferentes agentes del marco para la medición de la innovación, además de comparar su nivel de implementación en las seis políticas de diseño seleccionadas.Esta relación gráfica sirvió para visualizar que los vínculos existentes entre los agentes del sistema son los mismos que hay entre categorías, por lo tanto, las estrategias de las diferentes categorías hacen que se fortalezcan los vínculos y lazos entre los distintos agentes de un sistema de innovación de un país/región. Esta metodología puede ser adaptada para analizar diferentes sistemas o políticas de diseño. Replicar los resultados de esta investigación posibilitaría homologar políticas de diseño latinoamericanas en un contexto globalizado, al permitir compararlas con los sistemas de países punteros. Universidad Diego Portales Universitat Politècnica de València 2018-11-20 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://www.revista180.udp.cl/index.php/revista180/article/view/359 10.32995/rev180.Num-41.(2018).art-359 Revista 180; Núm. 41 (2018) Revista 180; Núm. 41 (2018) 0718-669X 0718-2309 spa https://www.revista180.udp.cl/index.php/revista180/article/view/359/381 Copyright (c) 2018 Revista 180 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0