Restrictions and arbitrary rules
Is architectural design a linear process? Can initial arguments foresee design?. If we consider the architectural design as a type of research that cannot anticipate accidents and discoveries through the process, we may suppose that the starting argumentative prescriptions cannot stay unchanged up t...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Online |
| Dil: | spa |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo
2016
|
| Online Erişim: | https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/41352 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| id |
oai:ojs.revistas.uchile.cl:article-41352 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.revistas.uchile.cl:article-413522018-03-14T20:50:07Z Restrictions and arbitrary rules Restricciones y arbitrariedades Palavecino Llanos, Claudio Is architectural design a linear process? Can initial arguments foresee design?. If we consider the architectural design as a type of research that cannot anticipate accidents and discoveries through the process, we may suppose that the starting argumentative prescriptions cannot stay unchanged up to the end of the project. From the academic experience of the architectural design studio “The Dictionary of Received Ideas”, I analyze the usefulness of the starting project arguments, that don’t define a desirable design object, but generate an operative framework of rules and boundaries that intentionally separates it from this desirable or recognizable condition. The arbitrary terms of this framework restates its utility as a tool for detachment from preconceptions. ¿Es el diseño arquitectónico un proceso lineal?, ¿puede anticiparse el diseño a partir de fundamentos iniciales fijos?. Si consideramos que el diseño arquitectónico es una forma de investigación, en la que jamás se pueden anticipar los accidentes y descubrimientos del proceso, podemos sospechar que las prescripciones argumentales iniciales no podrán mantenerse invariables hasta el estado final de un proyecto. A partir de la experiencia académica del taller de proyectos “El Diccionario de Ideas recibidas” se plantea un análisis acerca de la utilidad de los argumentos iniciales de proyecto, no para definir un diseño deseable, sino para generar un marco operativo de límites y reglas que nos alejan intencionalmente de esta condición deseable o conocida, y cuyo planteamiento arbitrario reafirma su utilidad como herramienta de desapego respecto de dichas preconcepciones. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo 2016-05-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/41352 10.5354/0719-5427.2016.41352 Revista de Arquitectura; Vol. 21 Núm. 30 (2016): Teoría del Proyecto; Pág. 19-28 0719-5427 0716-8772 spa https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/41352/42896 |
| institution |
Universidad de Chile |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Palavecino Llanos, Claudio |
| spellingShingle |
Palavecino Llanos, Claudio Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| author_facet |
Palavecino Llanos, Claudio |
| author_sort |
Palavecino Llanos, Claudio |
| title |
Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| title_short |
Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| title_full |
Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| title_fullStr |
Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| title_sort |
restrictions and arbitrary rules |
| description |
Is architectural design a linear process? Can initial arguments foresee design?. If we consider the architectural design as a type of research that cannot anticipate accidents and discoveries through the process, we may suppose that the starting argumentative prescriptions cannot stay unchanged up to the end of the project. From the academic experience of the architectural design studio “The Dictionary of Received Ideas”, I analyze the usefulness of the starting project arguments, that don’t define a desirable design object, but generate an operative framework of rules and boundaries that intentionally separates it from this desirable or recognizable condition. The arbitrary terms of this framework restates its utility as a tool for detachment from preconceptions. |
| publisher |
Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/41352 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT palavecinollanosclaudio restrictionsandarbitraryrules AT palavecinollanosclaudio restriccionesyarbitrariedades |
| _version_ |
1709645810881265664 |