On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena

This article proposes a political agenda for a disciplinary trespassing against capitalist rule drawing upon the reasons that worthed a Pritzker award and the curative job in Venice Biennale for Alejandro Aravena. In both cases, the institutions argued that Aravena embodies a social architect with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vergara Perucich, Francisco, Boano, Camillo
Format: Online
Language:spa
Published: Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo 2016
Online Access:https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/42516
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ojs.revistas.uchile.cl:article-42516
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.revistas.uchile.cl:article-425162018-03-14T20:37:48Z On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena Bajo escasez ¿Media casa basta? Reflexiones sobre el Pritzker de Alejandro Aravena Vergara Perucich, Francisco Boano, Camillo This article proposes a political agenda for a disciplinary trespassing against capitalist rule drawing upon the reasons that worthed a Pritzker award and the curative job in Venice Biennale for Alejandro Aravena. In both cases, the institutions argued that Aravena embodies a social architect with an agenda oriented to aid people living on scarcity. Along the article are revealed the ideological nature of these nominations and it exposes the necessity for emancipating architecture from the subjugation to profitability, capital accumulation, and power's reproduction. The subjugation to capital has destroyed the creative nature of the discipline, triggering a crisis whose release may be tackled through more theory, collective organization, and exploring new modes of production. The article claims for leaving the comfort zone for embracing the radicalism as a possible path toward disciplinary liberation. El artículo construye una agenda política de transgresión disciplinar contra el capitalismo a partir de las razones que valieron para Alejandro Aravena un Premio Pritzker y la curatoría de la Bienal de Venecia 2016. En ambos casos, las instituciones patrocinantes han informado que se reconoce el rol de Aravena como arquitecto social con una agenda orientada a ayudar a las personas de escasos recursos. A lo largo del artículo se expone la naturaleza ideológica de estas nominaciones y se expone la necesidad de emancipar la arquitectura de la subyugación a los objetivos de la rentabilidad, acumulación de capital y reproducción de ciclos de poder. Se argumenta que este sometimiento al capital ha destruido la naturaleza creativa de la disciplina generando una crisis cuya salida puede darse con más teorización, organización colectiva y explorando nuevos modos de producción. Se convoca a salir de la zona de confort y abrazar la crítica como un camino posible hacia la liberación disciplinar. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo 2016-11-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/42516 10.5354/0719-5427.2016.42516 Revista de Arquitectura; Vol. 21 Núm. 31 (2016): Arquitecturas colectivas; Pág. 37-46 0719-5427 0716-8772 spa https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/42516/46236
institution Universidad de Chile
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Vergara Perucich, Francisco
Boano, Camillo
spellingShingle Vergara Perucich, Francisco
Boano, Camillo
On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
author_facet Vergara Perucich, Francisco
Boano, Camillo
author_sort Vergara Perucich, Francisco
title On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
title_short On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
title_full On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
title_fullStr On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
title_full_unstemmed On scarcity: Is half of the house enough? Thoughts on the Pritzker Prize laureate Alejandro Aravena
title_sort on scarcity: is half of the house enough? thoughts on the pritzker prize laureate alejandro aravena
description This article proposes a political agenda for a disciplinary trespassing against capitalist rule drawing upon the reasons that worthed a Pritzker award and the curative job in Venice Biennale for Alejandro Aravena. In both cases, the institutions argued that Aravena embodies a social architect with an agenda oriented to aid people living on scarcity. Along the article are revealed the ideological nature of these nominations and it exposes the necessity for emancipating architecture from the subjugation to profitability, capital accumulation, and power's reproduction. The subjugation to capital has destroyed the creative nature of the discipline, triggering a crisis whose release may be tackled through more theory, collective organization, and exploring new modes of production. The article claims for leaving the comfort zone for embracing the radicalism as a possible path toward disciplinary liberation.
publisher Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo
publishDate 2016
url https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/article/view/42516
work_keys_str_mv AT vergaraperucichfrancisco onscarcityishalfofthehouseenoughthoughtsonthepritzkerprizelaureatealejandroaravena
AT boanocamillo onscarcityishalfofthehouseenoughthoughtsonthepritzkerprizelaureatealejandroaravena
AT vergaraperucichfrancisco bajoescasezmediacasabastareflexionessobreelpritzkerdealejandroaravena
AT boanocamillo bajoescasezmediacasabastareflexionessobreelpritzkerdealejandroaravena
_version_ 1709645773636894720