A comparative analysis of the implementation of regulatory policies of informal settlements in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
This paper addresses the different land-title and urban regulatory policies implemented in Latin America over the last decades, with a focus on the comparative experience of three countries of the region: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. To this end, this contribution offers a brief overview of the dev...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autoři: | , , |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Online |
| Jazyk: | spa eng |
| Vydáno: |
Revista INVI
2014
|
| On-line přístup: | https://revistainvi.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/view/62560 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | This paper addresses the different land-title and urban regulatory policies implemented in Latin America over the last decades, with a focus on the comparative experience of three countries of the region: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. To this end, this contribution offers a brief overview of the development of informal habitat and the housing situation of the aforementioned countries. Then, current urban regulations as well as federal landtitle and urban regulatory policies and the different entities involved in such a process are analyzed. Finally, this paper provides a comparison of the different interjurisdictional management and linking models of each country. The analysis offered in this research uses official statistics and secondary data on housing conditions, urban regulations and programs currently in force. Although sharing the same federal political organization, the comparative analysis shows considerable differences among the three studied countries regarding institutional structure and the relationship with their respective current property regimes. |
|---|