Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto
The paper develops a deep criticism of the dominant approaches to the study of urban poverty in the United States. According to the author, these approaches simplify the notion of ghetto to the extreme, thus turning this concept into the equivalent to pocket of poverty and divesting the term of hist...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Online |
| Dil: | spa |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Revista INVI
2013
|
| Online Erişim: | https://revistainvi.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/view/62609 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| Özet: | The paper develops a deep criticism of the dominant approaches to the study of urban poverty in the United States. According to the author, these approaches simplify the notion of ghetto to the extreme, thus turning this concept into the equivalent to pocket of poverty and divesting the term of historical specificity, heuristic potential and psychological value. The author advocates for the recovery of an institutional approach to the notion of ghetto and for the end to the exoticism built around this concept; thus, it is argued that the ghetto is the complex result of the articulation of a series of institutional agents and factors along with the operation of dominant political and economic structures. These agents and structures transcend the ghetto and reverberate throughout society rather than being the result of local particularities or the cultural essence of its dwellers. The paper aims to lay the foundations for further research. |
|---|