La máquina inútil
Utility pretends to be an argument that distinguishes between a work of architecture and a work of art, and between this work of art and a mere craftsman’s work. The aesthetic quality, the plastic condition and, after all, beauty, has been another argument for distancing a work of architecture from...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Langue: | por |
| Publié: |
Unisinos
2021
|
| Accès en ligne: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/5574 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| id |
oai:ojs.www.unisinos.br:article-5574 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.www.unisinos.br:article-55742021-05-25T00:28:29Z La máquina inútil La máquina inútil Pezo, Maurício Utility pretends to be an argument that distinguishes between a work of architecture and a work of art, and between this work of art and a mere craftsman’s work. The aesthetic quality, the plastic condition and, after all, beauty, has been another argument for distancing a work of architecture from a mere construction or engineering work. But, if that aesthetic quality, or its artistic condition, is reviewed according to the Kantian notion of “useless utility”, the argument seems to lose its stability. This text, therefore, is not about utility as function but as a general sense of any work. La utilidad pretende ser un argumento que discrimina entre una obra de arquitectura y una de arte, y entre ésta y una de mero artesanado. La calidad estética, la condición plástica y por último la belleza, ha sido otro de los argumentos que distancian a una obra de arquitectura de un mero trabajo de construcción o ingeniería. Pero si dicha calidad estética, o su condición artística, se revisa en base a la noción Kantiana de “utilidad sin fin”, el argumento parece perder estabilidad. Este texto, por tanto, no aborda la utilidad como función sino como sentido general de una obra. Unisinos 2021-05-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/5574 Arquitetura Revista; v. 3 n. 1 (2007): Jan-Jun; 37-41 1808-5741 por https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/5574/2781 Copyright (c) 2021 Arquitetura Revista |
| institution |
Universidad de Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
por |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Pezo, Maurício |
| spellingShingle |
Pezo, Maurício La máquina inútil |
| author_facet |
Pezo, Maurício |
| author_sort |
Pezo, Maurício |
| title |
La máquina inútil |
| title_short |
La máquina inútil |
| title_full |
La máquina inútil |
| title_fullStr |
La máquina inútil |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La máquina inútil |
| title_sort |
la máquina inútil |
| description |
Utility pretends to be an argument that distinguishes between a work of architecture and a work of art, and between this work of art and a mere craftsman’s work. The aesthetic quality, the plastic condition and, after all, beauty, has been another argument for distancing a work of architecture from a mere construction or engineering work. But, if that aesthetic quality, or its artistic condition, is reviewed according to the Kantian notion of “useless utility”, the argument seems to lose its stability. This text, therefore, is not about utility as function but as a general sense of any work. |
| publisher |
Unisinos |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/arquitetura/article/view/5574 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT pezomauricio lamaquinainutil |
| _version_ |
1709545728438697984 |