The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion
Since the built space has ethical, aesthetic, social, and symbolic implications in general, it is also a fundamental reference in the cultural and subjective life of its inhabitants, its designers, and those who, over time, modify turn the course of said space. This makes it very difficult to study,...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Online |
| Jazyk: | spa |
| Vydáno: |
Universidad de Costa Rica
2018
|
| On-line přístup: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/revistarquis/article/view/33846 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
|
| id |
oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article-33846 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article-338462019-05-24T20:15:18Z The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion La dimensión simbólica del espacio edificado: factores para una discusión epistémica Fuentes Farías, Francisco Javier Since the built space has ethical, aesthetic, social, and symbolic implications in general, it is also a fundamental reference in the cultural and subjective life of its inhabitants, its designers, and those who, over time, modify turn the course of said space. This makes it very difficult to study, so we are currently using various approaches that allow us to speak of a new understanding of urban and architectural thinking as well as new concepts and theoretical categories to approach from different positions to the reality of the built space. This paper summarizes the people’s subjective experiences in the city, conceptualized over key categories widely used in social theory such as social representations, urban imaginaries, and cultural identity. These key concepts are used in social sciences and constructivist geography to point out the result of the correlation between subjectivity and built space. In addition, we have an approach to neurosciences through phenomenological sociology which allows us to understand the basic processes of social and symbolic interaction. As a result, we have, in additionto scientific knowledge, through neurosciences and other applications in the social sciences of the scientific method, we have an enactive way of knowing, that is, that comes from the experience the researcher obtains as an inhabitant of the own city. Ya que el espacio construido tiene implicaciones éticas, estéticas, sociales, y simbólicas en general es también un referente fundamental en la vida cultural y subjetiva de sus habitantes, de sus diseñadores, y de aquellos que, con el tiempo, modifican a su vez el curso de dicho espacio. Esto hace muy complicado su estudio, por lo que actualmente se recurre a diversos enfoques que permiten hablar de una nueva comprensión del pensamiento urbanístico y arquitectónico, así como de nuevas concepciones y categorías teóricas para aproximarse desde distintas posiciones a la realidad del espacio construido. Éste escrito resume las experiencias subjetivas de las personas en la ciudad desde categorías conceptuales ampliamente usadas en la teoría social, tales como las representaciones sociales, los imaginarios urbanos, y la identidad cultural,conceptos clave usados en ciencias sociales y en geografía constructivista para señalar el resultado de la correlación entre subjetividad y espacio construido. Además, tenemos una aproximación a las neurociencias mediante la sociologíafenomenológica, que nos permite entender los procesos básicos de la interacción social y simbólica. Como resultado tenemos que, además del conocimiento científico, a través de las neurociencias y otras aplicaciones en ciencias sociales del método científico tenemos un modo de conocimiento enactivo, es decir, que procede de la experiencia, aquella que obtiene el investigador como habitante de la propia urbe. Universidad de Costa Rica 2018-06-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/epub+zip https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/revistarquis/article/view/33846 10.15517/ra.v7i2.33846 REVISTARQUIS; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2018): REVISTARQUIS 14 RevistArquis; Vol 7 No 2 (2018): REVISTARQUIS 14 RevistArquis; v. 7 n. 2 (2018): REVISTARQUIS 14 2215-275X 10.15517/ra.v7i2 spa https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/revistarquis/article/view/33846/33307 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/revistarquis/article/view/33846/38529 Derechos de autor 2018 Francisco Javier Fuentes Farías https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cr/ |
| institution |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Fuentes Farías, Francisco Javier |
| spellingShingle |
Fuentes Farías, Francisco Javier The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| author_facet |
Fuentes Farías, Francisco Javier |
| author_sort |
Fuentes Farías, Francisco Javier |
| title |
The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| title_short |
The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| title_full |
The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| title_fullStr |
The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The built space’s symbolic sphere: Notes to an epistemic discussion |
| title_sort |
built space’s symbolic sphere: notes to an epistemic discussion |
| description |
Since the built space has ethical, aesthetic, social, and symbolic implications in general, it is also a fundamental reference in the cultural and subjective life of its inhabitants, its designers, and those who, over time, modify turn the course of said space. This makes it very difficult to study, so we are currently using various approaches that allow us to speak of a new understanding of urban and architectural thinking as well as new concepts and theoretical categories to approach from different positions to the reality of the built space. This paper summarizes the people’s subjective experiences in the city, conceptualized over key categories widely used in social theory such as social representations, urban imaginaries, and cultural identity. These key concepts are used in social sciences and constructivist geography to point out the result of the correlation between subjectivity and built space. In addition, we have an approach to neurosciences through phenomenological sociology which allows us to understand the basic processes of social and symbolic interaction. As a result, we have, in additionto scientific knowledge, through neurosciences and other applications in the social sciences of the scientific method, we have an enactive way of knowing, that is, that comes from the experience the researcher obtains as an inhabitant of the own city. |
| publisher |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/revistarquis/article/view/33846 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT fuentesfariasfranciscojavier thebuiltspacessymbolicspherenotestoanepistemicdiscussion AT fuentesfariasfranciscojavier ladimensionsimbolicadelespacioedificadofactoresparaunadiscusionepistemica AT fuentesfariasfranciscojavier builtspacessymbolicspherenotestoanepistemicdiscussion |
| _version_ |
1709646737400922112 |