Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction

This paper analyzes the application of the compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land, which requires owners to comply with the social function of urban properties. The article discusses the structural regulatory framework under the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the City act...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme, Denaldi, Rosana
Format:	Online
Language:	por
Published:	Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. 2009
Online Access:	https://www.revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43638
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:revistas.usp.br:article-43638
record_format	ojs
institution	Universidade de São Paulo
collection	OJS
language	por
format	Online
author	Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme Denaldi, Rosana
spellingShingle	Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme Denaldi, Rosana Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
author_facet	Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme Denaldi, Rosana
author_sort	Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme
title	Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
title_short	Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
title_full	Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
title_fullStr	Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
title_full_unstemmed	Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
title_sort	compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction
description	This paper analyzes the application of the compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land, which requires owners to comply with the social function of urban properties. The article discusses the structural regulatory framework under the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the City act (Federal Law n. 10257/01) governing this legislation, as well as the specific case of Santo André, a municipality in the São Paulo metropolitan region. In 2006, Santo André began to notify owners of vacant and underutilized land, using specific criteria and procedures in the regulation and application of the above legislation. By the end of 2008, nearly 26 percent of the owners of all selected properties were notified, with about 65 percent located in the area of the Tamanduateí Axis. The monitoring process that took place from 2006 to 2008 identified several hurdles in the application of this instrument, such as legal, title, and record issues, the governability of local stakeholders, and difficulties in combining requirements such as subdividing and building in restricted-zoning areas. The Santo André experience also provides material for discussion of the frailness of the pact built to apply this instrument during the preparation and approval phases of the city's master plan as well as for understanding several issues that might be common to the urban policies of cities opting to use this legislation.
publisher	Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo.
publishDate	2009
url	https://www.revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43638
work_keys_str_mv	AT brunofilhofernandoguilherme compulsorysubdivisionconstructionandutilizationoflandaninstrumentstillunderconstruction AT denaldirosana compulsorysubdivisionconstructionandutilizationoflandaninstrumentstillunderconstruction AT brunofilhofernandoguilherme divisionenparcelasedificacionyutilizacionobligatoriosuninstrumentoaunenconstruccion AT denaldirosana divisionenparcelasedificacionyutilizacionobligatoriosuninstrumentoaunenconstruccion AT brunofilhofernandoguilherme parcelamentoedificacaoeutilizacaocompulsoriosuminstrumentoaindaemconstrucao AT denaldirosana parcelamentoedificacaoeutilizacaocompulsoriosuminstrumentoaindaemconstrucao
_version_	1709643994922745856
spelling	oai:revistas.usp.br:article-436382019-12-06T15:16:43Z Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction División en parcelas, edificación y utilización obligatorios: un instrumento (aún) en construcción Parcelamento, edificação e utilização compulsórios: um instrumento (ainda) em construção Bruno Filho, Fernando Guilherme Denaldi, Rosana Planejamento urbano direito urbanístico plano diretor política urbana gestão urbana Planificación urbana derecho urbanístico plan director política urbana gestión urbana Urban planning urban laws master plan urban policy urban management This paper analyzes the application of the compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land, which requires owners to comply with the social function of urban properties. The article discusses the structural regulatory framework under the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the City act (Federal Law n. 10257/01) governing this legislation, as well as the specific case of Santo André, a municipality in the São Paulo metropolitan region. In 2006, Santo André began to notify owners of vacant and underutilized land, using specific criteria and procedures in the regulation and application of the above legislation. By the end of 2008, nearly 26 percent of the owners of all selected properties were notified, with about 65 percent located in the area of the Tamanduateí Axis. The monitoring process that took place from 2006 to 2008 identified several hurdles in the application of this instrument, such as legal, title, and record issues, the governability of local stakeholders, and difficulties in combining requirements such as subdividing and building in restricted-zoning areas. The Santo André experience also provides material for discussion of the frailness of the pact built to apply this instrument during the preparation and approval phases of the city's master plan as well as for understanding several issues that might be common to the urban policies of cities opting to use this legislation. Este trabajo trata de la aplicación del instrumento de División en Parcelas, Edificación y Utilización Obligatorios - PEUC, a fin de exigir de los propietarios el cumplimiento de la función social de la propiedad inmobiliaria urbana. Aborda los marcos de la Constitución Federal y el Estatuto de la ciudad (Ley Federal n. 10.257/01), que regulan dicho instrumento. Presenta el caso de Santo André, municipio de la región metropolitana de São Paulo, que há iniciado la notificación de áreas vacantes y subutilizadas en 2006, y para eso ha establecido criterios y procedimientos específicos en la reglamentación y aplicación del instrumento. Hasta fines de 2008 habían sido notificados los proprietarios de cerca de 26% del total seleccionado, y de ellos aproximadamente 65% están localizados en el entorno del rio Tamanduateí. El régimen de monitoreo aplicado en el período de 2006 a 2008 há permitido identificar algunas barreras, tales como la cuestión de la seguridad jurídica, las dificultades relacionadas con las cuestiones de propiedad y registro, la governabilidad de los actores locales, y dificultades tales como la combinación entre la obligación de parcelar y edificar, y la zonificación restrictiva. La experiencia también permite discutir la fragilidad del pacto establecido para la aplicación del instrumento en el período de elaboración y aprobación del Plan Director, así como inferir diversas cuestiones que puede tener em común la política urbana de cualquier otro municipio que utilice el instrumento. Este trabalho trata da aplicação do instrumento de Parcelamento, Edificação e Utilização Compulsórios - PEUC, visando exigir dos proprietários o cumprimento da função social da propriedade imóvel urbana. Aborda os marcos da Constituição Federal e do Estatuto da cidade (Lei Federal n. 10.257/01) que regram o referido instrumento. Apresenta o caso de Santo André, município da região metropolitana de São Paulo, que iniciou a notificação de áreas vazias e subutilizadas em 2006 e, para tanto, estabeleceu específicos critérios e procedimentos na regulamentação e aplicação do instrumento. Até o final de 2008, haviam sido notificados os proprietários de cerca de 26% do total selecionado, sendo, destes, aproximadamente 65% localizados no Eixo Tamanduateí. O regime de monitoramento aplicado no período de 2006 a 2008 permitiu identificar entraves como a questão da segurança jurídica, as dificuldades relacionadas com as questões de titularidade e averbação, a governabilidade dos atores locais e dificuldades como a combinação da obrigação de parcelar e edificar com zoneamentos restritivos. A experiência também permite debater a fragilidade do pacto construído para aplicação do instrumento no período de elaboração e aprovação do plano diretor, bem como inferir diversas questões que podem ser comuns à política urbana de qualquer outro município o qual venha a lançar mão do instrumento. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. 2009-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://www.revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43638 10.11606/issn.2317-2762.v0i26p34-49 Pós. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP; n. 26 (2009); 34-49 Pós. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP; No. 26 (2009); 34-49 Pós. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da FAUUSP; Núm. 26 (2009); 34-49 2317-2762 1518-9554 por https://www.revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43638/47260 Copyright (c) 2009 Fernando Guilherme Bruno Filho, Rosana Denaldi

Compulsory subdivision, construction, and utilization of land: an instrument (still) under construction

Similar Items