Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America
The present reflection research is a theoretical analysis about urban sustainability and urban ecology political. The development of this article explores how urban sustainability and urban political ecology assume the dialectic of nature/urbanism as a central element in its propositions and also it...
Sparad:
| Huvudupphovsman: | |
|---|---|
| Materialtyp: | Online |
| Språk: | spa |
| Publicerad: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio
2017
|
| Länkar: | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483 |
| Taggar: |
Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!
|
| id |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-62483 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Contreras, Christian Hernán |
| spellingShingle |
Contreras, Christian Hernán Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| author_facet |
Contreras, Christian Hernán |
| author_sort |
Contreras, Christian Hernán |
| title |
Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| title_short |
Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| title_full |
Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| title_fullStr |
Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America |
| title_sort |
overcoming urban sustainability: a route for latin america |
| description |
The present reflection research is a theoretical analysis about urban sustainability and urban ecology political. The development of this article explores how urban sustainability and urban political ecology assume the dialectic of nature/urbanism as a central element in its propositions and also it analyses which are the radical differences that are conceived from their respective theoretical bases. In addition, it discusses the global visions that promote urban sustainability and it proposes approaches from urban political ecology, as a possible route for an urban analysis in Latin America. In conclusion, it is proposed to overcome the theoretical approaches of global urban sustainability, by approaches that assume the nature/urbanism processes as co-constituted constructions, in complex and dynamic environments, where multi-scalar (local, national, Regional and global) analysis prevail about the social, economic, political and ecological procedures of Latin American’s current urban landscapes. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT contreraschristianhernan overcomingurbansustainabilityarouteforlatinamerica AT contreraschristianhernan superarlasostenibilidadurbanaunarutaparaamericalatina AT contreraschristianhernan superandoasustentabilidadeurbanaumarotaparaaamericalatina |
| _version_ |
1709546709465432064 |
| spelling |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-624832019-09-23T22:02:59Z Overcoming urban sustainability: a route for Latin America Superar la sostenibilidad urbana: una ruta para América Latina Superando a sustentabilidade urbana: uma rota para a América Latina Contreras, Christian Hernán Urbanism nature urban sustainability urban political ecology urbanismo naturaleza sostenibilidad urbana ecología política urbana. Key words urbanism nature urban sustainability urban political ecology. Palavras-chave natureza sustentabilidade urbana a ecologia política urbana. urbanismo ecología teoría urbanismo arquitectura ciencias sociales ecología Urbanismo natureza sustentabilidade urbana a ecologia política urbana The present reflection research is a theoretical analysis about urban sustainability and urban ecology political. The development of this article explores how urban sustainability and urban political ecology assume the dialectic of nature/urbanism as a central element in its propositions and also it analyses which are the radical differences that are conceived from their respective theoretical bases. In addition, it discusses the global visions that promote urban sustainability and it proposes approaches from urban political ecology, as a possible route for an urban analysis in Latin America. In conclusion, it is proposed to overcome the theoretical approaches of global urban sustainability, by approaches that assume the nature/urbanism processes as co-constituted constructions, in complex and dynamic environments, where multi-scalar (local, national, Regional and global) analysis prevail about the social, economic, political and ecological procedures of Latin American’s current urban landscapes. Resumen: El presente trabajo de reflexión es un análisis teórico sobre sostenibilidad urbana y ecología política urbana. El desarrollo del artículo indaga sobre cómo la sostenibilidad urbana y la ecología política urbana, asumen la dialéctica naturaleza/urbanismo como elemento central en sus proposiciones y cuales son las diferencias radicales que se conciben desde sus respectivas bases teóricas. Adicionalmente se discute sobre las visiones globales que promueve la sostenibilidad urbana y se proponen planteamientos, desde la ecología política urbana, como una ruta posible para el análisis urbano en América Latina. A manera de conclusión se plantea superar los cuerpos teóricos de la sostenibilidad urbana de corte global, por enfoques que asuman los procesos naturaleza/urbanismo como construcciones co-constituidas, en entornos complejos y dinámicos, donde prevalezcan análisis multi-escalares (local, nacional, regional y global) de los procesos sociales, económicos, políticos y ecológicos de los actuales paisajes urbanos latinoamericanos. Este trabalho de reflexão é uma análise teórica da sustentabilidade urbana e ecologia política urbana. O artigo explora como sustentabilidade urbana e ecologia política urbana, assumem a dialética da natureza/urbanismo como um elemento central nas suas propostas e quais são as diferenças radicais que são concebidas a partir de suas respectivas bases teóricas. Além disso, se discute sobre as visões globais que promovem a sustentabilidade urbana e se propõem abordagens, desde a ecologia política urbana, como uma possível rota para a análise urbana na América Latina. Em conclusão, propõe-se superar os corpos teóricos da sustentabilidade urbana de corte global por abordagens que assumam os processos natureza/urbanismo como construções co-constituídas, em entornos complexos e dinâmicos, onde prevalecem a análise multi-escalar (local, nacional, regional e global) dos processos sociais, econômicos, políticos e ecológicos das atuais paisagens urbanas latino-americanos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio 2017-05-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares Artículo de reflexión application/pdf text/html application/xml https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483 10.15446/bitacora.v27n2.62483 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2017): Reflexiones a propósito de la nueva agenda urbana – hábitat III; 27-34 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2017): Reflexiones a propósito de la nueva agenda urbana – hábitat III; 27-34 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; v. 27 n. 2 (2017): Reflexiones a propósito de la nueva agenda urbana – hábitat III; 27-34 2027-145X 0124-7913 spa https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483/pdf https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483/html https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/62483/70467 /*ref*/Agnew, J. (2006). Geografías del conocimiento en la política mundial (Geographies of Knowledge in World Politics). Tabula Rasa, 4, 49–58. /*ref*/Alimonda, H. (2011). La Naturaleza Colonizada. (CLACSO, Ed.)Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (PRIMERA, Vol. 53). Buenos Aires: CICCUS. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Avila Calero, S. (2015). Entrevista a Enrique Leff. Ecología Política, 120–126. /*ref*/Bagchi-Sen, S., Cline-Cole, R., DeFilippis, J., Douglass, M., Emel, J., Hanson, S., … Waterstone, M. (2000). Towards a comprehensive geographical perspective on urban sustainability. Agenda, (January), 25. Recuperado a partir de https://policy.rutgers.edu/cupr/sustainability/sustain.pdf /*ref*/Benton-Short, L., & Short, J. R. (2008). Cities and Nature. (M. Miles & R. Short, Eds.)Urban Studies (1a ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/978-415-35588-9 /*ref*/Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Approaches to the study of land degradation. (H. C. B. Piers M. Blaikie, Ed.)Land Degradation and Society (Meuthuen). /*ref*/Bodlovich, A., & Girardet, H. (2001). Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. Management, 4(December), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400214 /*ref*/Borja, J., & Castells, M. (1997). Local & Global. Management of cities in the information age. (J. Borja & M. Castells, Eds.) (1a ed., Vol. 53). London and New York: Naciones Unidas. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the “Urban” Politics of Climate Change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178 Carrión, F. (2016). La “Agenda Oculta” de Habitat III en Quito. Recuperado a partir de https://www.plataformaurbana.cl/archive/2016/12/01/opinion-la-agenda-oculta-de-habitat-iii-en-quito/ /*ref*/Castells, M. (1972). City, Class and Power. (M. Castells, Ed.)Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015 (1a ed., Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan Education. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. (E. Arnold, Ed.)MIT Press (1a ed., Vol. 1). Madison: Arnold, Edward. https://doi.org/10.3817/0681048220 /*ref*/Castree, N. (2000). Marxism and the Production of Nature. Capital & Class, 24(3), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680007200102 /*ref*/Castree, N. (2005). Nature. Manchester: Taylor & Francis. /*ref*/Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3999 /*ref*/Coronil, F. (2000). Naturaleza del poscolonialismo: del eurocentrismo al globocentrismo. En CLACSO (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas (p. 246). Buenos Aires: Edgardo Lander (comp.) CLACSO. /*ref*/Cronon, W. (1996). The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085903254969 /*ref*/Daniels, T. (2001). Smart Growth: A New American Approach to Regional Planning. Planning Practice & Research, Vol. 16(Nos 3/4), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745012010788 /*ref*/Delgado, G. C. (2014). Ecología política del metabolismo urbano y los retos para la conformación de ciudades de bajo carbono: una lectura desde América Latina. Crítica y emancipación, 12, 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Demeritt, D. (2002). What is the “social construction of nature”? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 767–790. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph402oa /*ref*/Douglas, I., Huggett, R., & Robinson, M. (1996). Companion Encyclopedia of Geography: The Environment and Humankind. (I. Douglas, R. Huggett, & M. Robinson, Eds.) (1a ed.). London: Routledge. Recuperado a partir de papers3://publication/uuid/F9E138BB-10E0-4BFE-ABCF-74DFA3BD3E2B /*ref*/Echebarria, C., Barrutia, J. M., & Aguado, I. (2004). Local Agenda 21: Progress in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776404041490 /*ref*/Eschenhagen, M. L. (2008). Aproximaciones al pensamiento ambiental de Enrique Leff: un desafío y una aventura que enriquece el sentido de la vida. ISEE Publicación Ocasional, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201234Supplement57 /*ref*/Escobar, A. (1999). El final del salvaje. Naturaleza, cultura y política en la antropología contemporanea. (C. Libre, Ed.) (ICAN). Bogotá: Serie Textos. /*ref*/Escobar, A. (2003). Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo. El programa de investigación modernidad/colonialidad latinoamericano. Tabula Rasa, (1), 51–86. Recuperado a partir de papers3://publication/uuid/57E1A71C-D031-4DF8-8F2B-942EB25032ED /*ref*/Escobar, A. (2007). WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506 /*ref*/Fischer, F., & Hajer, M. (1999). Living With Nature. (F. Fischer & M. Hajer, Eds.)Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (1a ed., Vol. 53). New York: Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Goldman, M., & Schurman, R. A. (2000). CLOSING THE “GREATDIVIDE”: New Social Theory on Society andNature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 563–584. Recuperado a partir de https://www.urbanjustice.net/courses/sides2015/readings/week6/class11/goldmn1.pdf /*ref*/Gómez, E. D. (2006). La ecología política urbana: Una disciplina emergence para el análisis del cambio socioambiental en entornos ciudadanos. Documents d’Analisi Geografica, (48), 167–178. /*ref*/Greider, T., & Lorraine, G. (1994). Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24. /*ref*/HABITAT, O. (2009). Planificación de Ciudades Sostenibles: Orientaciones Para Políticas. Informe Global Sobre Asentamientos Humanos 2009 (1a ed.). (N. Unidas, Ed.). Londres: Naciones Unidas. Recuperado a partir de https://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009 /*ref*/Hannigan, J. (2014). Environmental Sociology. (J. Hannigan, Ed.) (Third). Toronto: Routledge. /*ref*/Haraway, D. (1984). Manifiesto Ciborg, 43. /*ref*/Harvey, D. (1996). Cities or urbanization? City, 1(1–2), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819608900022 /*ref*/Harvey, D. (2004). Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. (D. of Geography, Ed.) (Vol. 1). University of Heidelberg. /*ref*/Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Urban Geography (Vol. 28). https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.206 /*ref*/Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S., & Robbins, P. (2007). Neoliberal Environments. (B. L. Cataloguing, Ed.)False promises and unnatural … (First). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946848 /*ref*/Heynen, N., Perkins, H. A., & Roy, P. (2006). The Political Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 3–25. /*ref*/Hough, M. (2004). Cities and Natural Process: A Basis for Sustainability. (P. Press, Ed.) (1a ed.). New York: Routledge. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=pj8cderhbr8C /*ref*/Jackson, P. T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics (First). New York: Routledge. /*ref*/Jones, O. (2009). After Nature: Entangled Worlds. A Companion to Environmental Geography, 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305722.ch18 /*ref*/Jordán, R., & Simioni, D. (2003). Gestión urbana para el desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe. (CEPAL, Ed.)Gestión urbana para el desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: Naciones Unidas. Recuperado a partir de https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/2376/S2003000_es.pdf?sequence=1 Keil, R. (2003). Urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 24(8), 723–738. https://doi.org/Doi 10.2747/0272-3638.24.8.723 /*ref*/Lander, E. (2000). La colonialidad del saber : eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales . Perspectivas latinoamericanas. Buenos Aires. /*ref*/Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes <engl.>. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(96)88504-6 /*ref*/Latour, B. (2005). Reensamblar lo social. Una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. (Oxford, Ed.)Oxford University Press (1a ed.). Buenos Aires: Manantial. /*ref*/Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space. (H. Lefebvre, Ed.) (1a ed.). New York: Wiley. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=SIXcnIoa4MwC /*ref*/Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Eds.)Analysis (1a ed., Vol. 53). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution. (H. Lefebvre, Ed.). New York: University of Minnesota Press. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=5_dbeJX3EPsC /*ref*/Leff, E. (2003). La Ecología Política en América Latina . Un campo en construcción. /*ref*/Leff, E. (2009). Pensamiento Ambiental Latinoamericano *, (2000), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201234Supplement58 /*ref*/Leff, E. (2010). Ecología y capital: racionalidad ambiental, democracia participativa y desarrollo sustentable. (U. N. A. de México, Ed.) (Sexta). México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=bUsfFF_DXskC Leff, E. (2011). Economía ecológica, racionalidad ambiental y sustentabilidad. Sustentabilidad(es), (2), 5–9. Recuperado a partir de https://www.sustentabilidades.cl/Revista/revista/index.php/sus/article/view/53 /*ref*/Livingstone, D. N. (2005). Science , geography text and space: thoughts on the of reading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 391–401. /*ref*/Machado Araoz, H. (2010). La “Naturaleza” como objeto colonial. Una mirada desde la condición eco-bio-política del colonialismo contemporáneo. Episteme, (10), 35–47. /*ref*/Munda, G. (1997). Environmental economics, ecological economics, and the concept of sustainable development. Environmental Values, 6(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679158 /*ref*/O’Connor, J. (2001). La segunda contradicción del capitalismo. En Causas naturales: Ensayos de marxismo ecológico (pp. 2–17). México: Siglo XXI. /*ref*/O’Connor, J. (2002). ¿Es posible el capitalismo sostenible? Ecología Política. Naturaleza, sociedad y utopía. …, 27–52. Recuperado a partir de https://www.youkali.net/youkali11-e-Clasico-OConnor.pdf /*ref*/Ormrod, J. S. (2016). Changing our schools environment, Changing ourselves. (J. S. Ormrod, Ed.) (1a ed.). Brigton: Palgrave. /*ref*/Popper, E. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Physics Today (First, Vol. 12). London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577 /*ref*/Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2a ed.). Malden: Wiley John. Recuperado a partir de https://books.google.com/books?id=NixJcZnSsv8C&pgis=1 /*ref*/Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science, 64(4), 1033–1053. /*ref*/Sopla, & Dane, F. (2013). El Desafio del Desarrollo Sustentable en América Latina. (F. Dane, Ed.) (SOPLA). Rio de Janeiro. /*ref*/Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global Environmental Governance. (J. G. Speth & P. M. Haas, Eds.) (1a ed.). Washington: Island Press. /*ref*/Swyngedouw, E. (1997). A Power, nature, and the city. The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880-1990.pdf, 29(1), 311–332. /*ref*/Swyngedouw, E. (1999). and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00157 /*ref*/Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Social Power and the Urbanization of Water. (G. Clark, A. Goudie, & C. Peach, Eds.)Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015 (Vol. 1). New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 /*ref*/Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of Scale. Antipode, (Special), 898–918. /*ref*/UN-HABITAT. (2016). Habitat Iii Zero Draft of the New Urban Agenda (Vol. 2016). Recuperado a partir de https://www.habitat3.org/bitcache/3d1efc3b20a4f563ce673671f83ea0f767b26c10?vid=578792&disposition=inline&op=view /*ref*/United Nations. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio. Reproduction. Brazil. Recuperado a partir de https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/Agenda21.pdf /*ref*/United Nations. (1996). Declaración de Estambul_ HABITAT II. Estambul. /*ref*/Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces. (SAGE, Ed.). London: Whatmore, Sarah. /*ref*/Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084550 Derechos de autor 2017 Bitácora Urbano Territorial https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |