Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness
Assessing the relationships between transport infrastructure and the territory is a complex task due to the multiple factors involved in it, being the quantification of accessibility one of the basic tools for its analysis. Thus, given the special interest in planning and regional planning, at all s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Sprog: | spa |
| Udgivet: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio
2019
|
| Online adgang: | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
| id |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-68085 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
López-Escolano, Carlos Pueyo Campos, Ángel |
| spellingShingle |
López-Escolano, Carlos Pueyo Campos, Ángel Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| author_facet |
López-Escolano, Carlos Pueyo Campos, Ángel |
| author_sort |
López-Escolano, Carlos |
| title |
Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| title_short |
Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| title_full |
Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| title_fullStr |
Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| title_sort |
basic territorial accessibility measures. approaches, evolution and usefulness |
| description |
Assessing the relationships between transport infrastructure and the territory is a complex task due to the multiple factors involved in it, being the quantification of accessibility one of the basic tools for its analysis. Thus, given the special interest in planning and regional planning, at all scales, the contributions in this field are numerous and have been approached from different points of view, enriching both conceptual and practical discourse. This work of reflection therefore assesses the role of the measure of accessibility in territorial studies by reviewing and sharing the main proposed conceptual approaches to accessibility from a geographical perspective. It also compares some of the basic measures and indicators that have been formulated for its assessment. To conclude, the usefulness of territorial accessibility measures must be highlighted for territorial studies at different scales and as a decision-making support tool for territorial planning. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT lopezescolanocarlos basicterritorialaccessibilitymeasuresapproachesevolutionandusefulness AT pueyocamposangel basicterritorialaccessibilitymeasuresapproachesevolutionandusefulness AT lopezescolanocarlos medidasbasicasdeaccesibilidadterritorialenfoquesevolucionyutilidades AT pueyocamposangel medidasbasicasdeaccesibilidadterritorialenfoquesevolucionyutilidades AT lopezescolanocarlos mesuresdebasedelaccessibiliteterritorialeapprochesevolutionetutilite AT pueyocamposangel mesuresdebasedelaccessibiliteterritorialeapprochesevolutionetutilite AT lopezescolanocarlos medidasbasicasdeacessibilidadeterritorialabordagensevolucaoeutilidades AT pueyocamposangel medidasbasicasdeacessibilidadeterritorialabordagensevolucaoeutilidades |
| _version_ |
1709546716618817536 |
| spelling |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-680852020-01-13T21:27:14Z Basic territorial accessibility measures. Approaches, evolution and usefulness Medidas básicas de accesibilidad territorial. Enfoques, evolución y utilidades Mesures de base de l’accessibilité territoriale. Approches, évolution et utilité Medidas básicas de acessibilidade territorial. Abordagens, evolução e utilidades López-Escolano, Carlos Pueyo Campos, Ángel accessibility transport indicators planning accesibilidad transporte indicadores planificación Geografía de los Transportes Geografía accessibilité transport indicateurs planification acessibilidade transporte indicadores planejamento Assessing the relationships between transport infrastructure and the territory is a complex task due to the multiple factors involved in it, being the quantification of accessibility one of the basic tools for its analysis. Thus, given the special interest in planning and regional planning, at all scales, the contributions in this field are numerous and have been approached from different points of view, enriching both conceptual and practical discourse. This work of reflection therefore assesses the role of the measure of accessibility in territorial studies by reviewing and sharing the main proposed conceptual approaches to accessibility from a geographical perspective. It also compares some of the basic measures and indicators that have been formulated for its assessment. To conclude, the usefulness of territorial accessibility measures must be highlighted for territorial studies at different scales and as a decision-making support tool for territorial planning. Evaluar las relaciones entre las infraestructuras de transporte y el territorio es una tarea compleja debido a los múltiples factores que intervienen en ello, siendo la cuantificación de la accesibilidad uno de los instrumentos básicos para su análisis. Ante el creciente interés que presenta la accesibilidad para la planificación del territorio, las aportaciones en este campo son numerosas y diversas, enriqueciendo los discursos conceptuales y prácticos. Este trabajo valora el papel de la medida de la accesibilidad en los estudios territoriales mediante la revisión y puesta en común de los enfoques conceptuales principales desde una perspectiva geográfica, comparando medidas e indicadores básicos que se han formulado para su valoración. Como conclusión, cabe valorar la medida de la accesibilidad territorial como instrumento imprescindible para estudios territoriales a diferentes escalas gracias a sus múltiples utilidades y como herramienta de apoyo para la toma de decisiones en el diseño de la planificación territorial. Cet article évalue les relations qui existent entre les infrastructures de transport et le territoire. Une approche complexe en raison des facteurs qui sont impliqués. Pour cela, l'un des instruments de base pour cette analyse est la quantification de l'accessibilité. Ce travail répond à l'intérêt croissant porté à l'évaluation de l'accessibilité dans la planification territoriale. Les contributions conceptuelles et opérationnelle dans ce domaine sont nombreuses et diverses. Ce travail considère la mesure de l'accessibilité dans les études territoriales. Un examen conceptuel est effectué du point de vue géographique, en comparant mesures et indicateurs. En conclusion, on peut indiquer que la mesure de l'accessibilité est un instrument essentiel, à différentes échelles, dans les études territoriales. La mesure de l'accessibilité offre de multiples utilisations et constitue un outil d'aide à la décision dans la conception de la planification territoriale. Avaliar as relações existentes entre as infraestruturas de transporte e o território é uma tarefa complexa devido aos múltiplos fatores que nele intervém, sendo a quantificação da acessibilidade um dos instrumentos básicos para sua análise. Assim, e dado o interesse especial que o planejamento e a Ordenação do Território apresentam em todas as escalas, as contribuições nesse campo são numerosos e têm sido focados desde diferentes pontos de vista, enriquecendo tanto o discurso conceitual como prático. Este trabalho de reflexão valoriza, portanto, o papel da acessibilidade medida em estudos territoriais através da revisão e compartilhamento das principais abordagens conceituais propostas sobre a acessibilidade desde o ponto de vista geográfico. Ele também compara algumas das medidas e indicadores básicos que têm sido desenvolvidos para sua avaliação. O artigo conclui-se com a evidência de que a medida de acessibilidade territorial é uma ferramenta imprescindível para os estudos territoriais. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio 2019-09-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares Artículo de reflexión application/pdf text/html application/xml https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085 10.15446/bitacora.v29n3.68085 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2019): Movilidad, Diseño Participativo y Espacio público; 49-57 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2019): Movilidad, Diseño Participativo y Espacio público; 49-57 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; v. 29 n. 3 (2019): Movilidad, Diseño Participativo y Espacio público; 49-57 2027-145X 0124-7913 spa https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085/pdf https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085/html https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/68085/XML /*ref*/ARRANZ-LÓPEZ, A., et al. (2017). “Retail mobility environments: a methodological framework for integrating retail activity and non-motorised accessibility in Zaragoza, Spain”. Journal of Transport Geography, 58: 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.010 /*ref*/BARADARAN, S. y RAMJERDI, F. (2001). “Performance of Accessibility Measures in Europe”. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4 (2/3): 31-48. Consultado en: https://www.bts.gov/archive/publications/journal_of_transportation_and_statistics/volume_04_number_23/paper_03/index /*ref*/BATTY, M. (2009). “Accessibility: in search of a unified theory. Editorial”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36: 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3602ed /*ref*/BAVOUX, J. J., et al. (2005). Géographie des transports. París: Armand Colin. /*ref*/BRUINSMA, F. y RIETVELD, P. (1998). “The accessibility of the European cities: theoretical framework and comparison of approaches”. Environment and Planning A, 30 (3): 499-521. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300499 /*ref*/CALVO PALACIOS, J. L., et al. (1993). “Matización de los valores cartográficos de accesibilidad por carretera de la España Peninsular en función de la variable demográfica”. IV Jornadas de la Población Española. San Cristóbal de la Laguna: Universidad de la Laguna, pp. 191-200. /*ref*/CASS, N., SHOVE, E. y URRY, J. (2005). “Social exclusion, mobility and access”. The Sociological Review, 53 (3): 539-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00565.x /*ref*/CHESNAIS, M. (1997). “Le transport, élément d’une stratégie complexe ”. En: J. Marcadon, et al. (eds.), Les transports. París: Armand Colin, pp. 7-35. /*ref*/COMISIÓN EUROPEA. (1999). Estrategia Territorial Europea. Hacia un desarrollo equilibrado y sostenible del territorio de la UE. Potsdam: Comisión Europea. Consultado en: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_es.pdf /*ref*/CONVERSE, P. D. (1949). “New laws of retail gravitation”. Journal of Marketing, 14: 379- 384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1248191 /*ref*/EL-GENEIDY, A. y LEVINSON, D. (2011). “Place rank: valuing spatial interactions”. Networks and Spatial Economics, 11 (4): 643-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9153-z /*ref*/ELLEGÅRD, K. y SVEDIN, U. (2012). “Torsten Hägerstrand’s time-geography as the cradle of the activity approach in transport geography”. Journal of Transport Geography, 23: 17- 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.023 /*ref*/ESCALONA ORCAO, A. I. (1989). “Tendencias actuales de la geografía del transporte: el análisis de la movilidad”. Geographicalia, 26: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_geoph/geoph.1989261908 /*ref*/ESPON. (2012). TRACC Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe. Consultado en: https://www.espon.eu/tracc /*ref*/FARRINGTON, J. H. (2007). “The new narrative of accessibility: its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography”. Journal of Transport Geography, 15 (5): 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.007 /*ref*/FARRINGTON, J. y FARRINGTON, C. (2005). “Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualization”. Journal of Transport Geography, 13: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002 /*ref*/GARCÍA PALOMARES, J. C. (2000). “La medida de la accesibilidad”. Revistas del Ministerio de Transporte, Turismo y Comunicaciones, 88: 95-110. /*ref*/GEERTMAN, S. C. M. y VAN ECK, J. R. R. (1995). “GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning”. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (1): 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799508902025 /*ref*/GEURS, K. T. y RITSEMA VAN ECK, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM report 408505 006. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. /*ref*/GEURS, K. T. y VAN WEE, B. (2004). “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions”. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2): 127- 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 /*ref*/GUTIÉRREZ PUEBLA, J., (2001). “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border”. Journal of Transport Geography, 9 (4): 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966- 6923(01)00017-5 /*ref*/HÄGERSTRAND, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. /*ref*/HALDEN, D. (2002). “Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians”. Transport Policy, 9: 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00017-3 /*ref*/HANSEN, W. B. (1959). “How accessibility shapes land use”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25 (2): 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307 /*ref*/HARRIS, B. (2001). “Accessibility: concepts and applications”. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4 (2/3): 15-30. /*ref*/HARRIS, C. D. (1954). “The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44: 315-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2561395 /*ref*/HINE, J. (2009). “Transport and Social Exclusion”. En: R. Kitchin y N. Thrift (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 429-434. /*ref*/HOLL, A. (2011). “Mejoras de accesibilidad viaria: un estudio retrospectivo para la España peninsular”. Papeles de Geografía, 53-54: 171-183. Consultado en: https://revistas.um.es/geografia/article/view/143511 /*ref*/HOUET, T. y GOURMELON, F. (2014). “La géoprospective – Apport de la dimension spatiale aux démarches prospectives”. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Systèmes, Modélisation, Géostatistiques, 667. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.26194 /*ref*/KENYON, S., LYONS, G. y RAFFERTY, J. (2002). “Transport and social exclusion. Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility”. Journal of Transport Geography, 10 (3): 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1 /*ref*/KRUGMAN, P. (1992). “A dynamic spatial model”. Working Paper Series of National Bureau of Economic Research, 4219: 1-43. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4219 /*ref*/LÓPEZ, E., GUTIÉRREZ, J. y GÓMEZ, G. (2008). “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach”. European Planning Studies, 16 (2): 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701814629 /*ref*/LÓPEZ-ESCOLANO, C. y PUEYO CAMPOS, Á. (2018). “Medida y valoración de la accesibilidad viaria en España: revisión de casos”. Ciudad y Territorio. Estudios Territoriales, 197: 473-486. Consultado en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6685394 /*ref*/LÓPEZ-ESCOLANO, C., et al. (2016). “Valoración y representación cartográfica de la accesibilidad viaria en la España peninsular: 1960-2014”. GeoFocus, 18: 169-189. https://dx.doi.org/10.21138/GF.486 /*ref*/MARTELLATO, D., NIJKAMP, P. y REGGIANI, A. (1998). “Measurement and measures of network accessibility: economic perspectives”. En: K. Button, P. Nijkamp, y H. Priemus (eds.), Transport networks in Europe: concepts, analysis and policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 161-179. /*ref*/MÉRENNE-SCHOUMAKER, E. (2008). Géographie des transports. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. /*ref*/MONZÓN DE CÁCERES, A. (1988). “Los indicadores de accesibilidad y la planificación del transporte: Concepto y clasificación”. Revistas del Ministerio de Transporte, Turismo y Comunicaciones, 35: 11-18. /*ref*/MORRIS, J. M., DUMBLE, P. L. y WIGAN, M. R. (1979). “Accessibility indicators in transport planning”. Transportation Research A, 13: 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191- 2607(79)90012-8 /*ref*/MOSELEY, M. J. (1979). Accessibility: the rural challenge. Londres: Methuen. /*ref*/NUTLEY, S. (1998). “Rural areas: the accessibility problem”. En: B. Hoyle y R. Knowles (eds.), Modern transport geography. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 185-215. /*ref*/PÁEZ, A., SCOTT, D. M. y MORENCY, C. (2012). “Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators”. Journal of Transport Geography, 25: 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016 /*ref*/PRESTON, J. y RAJÉ, F. (2007). “Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion”. Journal of Transport Geography, 15 (3): 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002 /*ref*/PUEYO CAMPOS, Á., et al. (2016). “Los mapas de potenciales de población: una herramienta para el estudio de la organización territorial del Sur de Europa”. En: R. García /*ref*/Marín, et al. (eds.), Actas XV Coloquio Ibérico de Geografía. Retos y tendencias de la Geografía Ibérica. Murcia: Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, pp. 1222-1235. /*ref*/PUEYO CAMPOS, Á., LÓPEZ ESCOLANO, C. y HERNÁNDEZ NAVARRO, M. L. (2018). “Nuevos espacios y realidades a partir del análisis especial: un territorio distinto de ideas preconcebidas”. En: J. Farinós Dasí (coord.) y J. Farinós y E. Peiro (eds.), Territorio y Estado. Elementos para la coordinación de las políticas de ordenación del territorio en el siglo XXI. Valencia: Tirant, pp. 785-828. /*ref*/PUEYO, Á., et al. (2013). “Supranational study of population potential: Spain and France”. Journal of Maps, 9 (1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2013.764831 /*ref*/PUEYO, Á., JOVER, J. M. y ZÚÑIGA, M. (2012). “Accessibility evaluation of the transportation network in Spain during the first decade of the twenty-first century”. En: J. M. de Ureña (ed.), Territorial implications of high speed rail. A Spanish perspective. London: Ashgate, pp. 83-104. /*ref*/REGGIANI, A. (2012). “Accessibility, connectivity and resilience in complex networks”. En: K. T. Geurs, K. J. Krizek y A. Reggiani (eds.), Accessibility analysis and transport planning. Challenges for Europe and North America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 15-36. /*ref*/REILLY, W. J. (1931). The law of retail gravitation. Nueva York: Knickerbocker Press. RICH, D. C. (1980). Potential models in human geography. Norwich: Geo Abstracts. RIETVELD, P. y BRUINSMA, F. (1998). Is transport infrastructure effective? Transport infrastructure and accessibility: impacts on the space economy. Berlín: Springer. /*ref*/RODRIGUE, J. P., COMTOIS, C. y SLACK, B. (2017). The geography of transport systems. Abingdon: Routledge. /*ref*/SALAS-OLMEDO, M. H., GARCÍA-ALONSO, P. y GUTIÉRREZ, J. (2015). “Accessibility and transport infrastructure improvement assessment: the role of borders and multilateral resistance”. Transportation Research Part A, 82: 110-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.009 /*ref*/SEGUÍ, J. M. y MARTÍNEZ, M. R. (2004). Geografía de los transportes. Palma: Universitat de les Illes Balears. /*ref*/SHAW, J., KNOWLES, R. D. y DOHERTY, I. (2008). “Introducing transport geographies”. En: R. D. Knowles, J. Shaw e I. Doherty (eds.), Transport geographies: mobilities, flows and spaces. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3-9. /*ref*/STELDER, D. (2014). “Regional accessibility trends in Europe: road infrastructure, 1957– 2012”. Regional Studies, 48: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.952721 /*ref*/STEWART, J. Q. (1947). “Empirical mathematical rules concerning distribution and equilibrium of population”. Geographical Review, 37 (3): 461-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/211132 /*ref*/TALAVERA-GARCÍA, R. y VALENZUELA-MONTES, L. M. (2012). “La accesibilidad peatonal en la integración espacial de las paradas de transporte público”. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 21 (2): 97-109. Consultado en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/28532 /*ref*/VAN WEE, B., HAGOORT, M. y ANNEMA, J. A. (2001). “Accessibility measures in competition”. Journal of Transport Geography, 9: 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00010-2 /*ref*/VULEVIC, A. (2016). “Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review”. Logistics & Sustainable Transport, 7 (1): 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlst-2016-0006 /*ref*/WEGENER, M. (1995). “Accessibility and development impacts”. En: D. Banister (ed.), Transport and urban development. London: E&FN Spon, pp. 157-161. /*ref*/WILSON, A. G. (1967). “A statistical theory of spatial distribution models”. Transportation Research, 1: 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(67)90035-4 /*ref*/XUAN, Z. y SUXIA, L. (2004). “Analysis of the impact of the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using an integrated GIS tool”. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2): 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.003 /*ref*/ZIPF, G. K. (1949): Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley. Derechos de autor 2019 Bitácora Urbano Territorial https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |