Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon
Open data platforms are being widely adapted in cities with a promise to boost the economy and empower citizens. However, researchers have drawn attention to the ineffectiveness of such initiatives, unless they are designed taking into account the local context and ecosystem of actors. Yet, literatu...
Spremljeno u:
| Glavni autor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Jezik: | eng |
| Izdano: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio
2020
|
| Online pristup: | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/80740 |
| Oznake: |
Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
| id |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-80740 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Slobodova, Olga |
| spellingShingle |
Slobodova, Olga Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| author_facet |
Slobodova, Olga |
| author_sort |
Slobodova, Olga |
| title |
Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| title_short |
Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| title_full |
Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| title_fullStr |
Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon |
| title_sort |
motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. case study of discrete actors in lyon |
| description |
Open data platforms are being widely adapted in cities with a promise to boost the economy and empower citizens. However, researchers have drawn attention to the ineffectiveness of such initiatives, unless they are designed taking into account the local context and ecosystem of actors. Yet, literature review demonstrates a gap in addressing individual motivations of actors and in particular discrete civil society actors to use open data. Building upon studies on individual motivations in open government, we propose a heuristic model of interconnection between societal outcomes of open data and individual motivations of the actors.Analysis of the open data initiative and ecosystem in Lyon is based on interviews and platform analysis. Our findings show that civil society actors in Lyon have the expertise to create knowledge and services from open data, but they fail to appropriate the latter for the lack of communication channels with the platform managers. Consequently, possible modalities of interaction are discussed and further research agenda is proposed to better understand the connection between individual motivations, open data platform design and broader societal outcomes. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/80740 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT slobodovaolga motivationsofcivilsocietyactorstoreuseopendatacasestudyofdiscreteactorsinlyon AT slobodovaolga motivacionesdelosactoresdelasociedadcivilparareutilizardatosabiertosunestudiodecasodeactoresdiscretosenlyon AT slobodovaolga motivationsdesacteursdelasocietecivileareutiliserlesdonneesouvertesuneetudedecasdacteursdiscretsalyon AT slobodovaolga motivacoesdosatoresdasociedadecivilparareutilizardadosabertosumestudodecasodeatoresdiscretosemlyon |
| _version_ |
1709546725752963072 |
| spelling |
oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-807402020-09-09T14:57:51Z Motivations of civil society actors to reuse open data. Case study of discrete actors in Lyon Motivaciones de los actores de la sociedad civil para reutilizar datos abiertos. Un estudio de caso de actores discretos en Lyon Motivations des acteurs de la société civile à réutiliser les données ouvertes. Une étude de cas d’acteurs discrets à Lyon Motivações dos atores da sociedade civil para reutilizar dados abertos. Um estudo de caso de atores discretos em Lyon Slobodova, Olga e-gouvernance accès à l' information participation société civile motivation electronic governance access to information participation civil society motivation gobierno electrónico acceso a la información participación sociedad civil motivación governo eletrônico acesso à informação participação sociedade civil motivação Open data platforms are being widely adapted in cities with a promise to boost the economy and empower citizens. However, researchers have drawn attention to the ineffectiveness of such initiatives, unless they are designed taking into account the local context and ecosystem of actors. Yet, literature review demonstrates a gap in addressing individual motivations of actors and in particular discrete civil society actors to use open data. Building upon studies on individual motivations in open government, we propose a heuristic model of interconnection between societal outcomes of open data and individual motivations of the actors.Analysis of the open data initiative and ecosystem in Lyon is based on interviews and platform analysis. Our findings show that civil society actors in Lyon have the expertise to create knowledge and services from open data, but they fail to appropriate the latter for the lack of communication channels with the platform managers. Consequently, possible modalities of interaction are discussed and further research agenda is proposed to better understand the connection between individual motivations, open data platform design and broader societal outcomes. Las plataformas de datos abiertos se están adaptando ampliamente en las ciudades con la promesa de impulsar la economía y empoderar a los ciudadanos. Sin embargo, los investigadores han llamado la atención sobre la ineficacia de tales iniciativas, a menos que estén diseñadas teniendo en cuenta el ecosistema de actores. Empero, una revisión de la literature en datos abiertos demuestra una brecha entre el tratamiento de las motivaciones individuales de los actores y, en particular, de los actores discretos de la sociedad civil. Con base en estudios sobre motivaciones individuales en gobierno abierto, proponemos un modelo heurístico de interconexión entre los resultados sociales de datos abiertos y motivaciones individuales de los actores.El análisis de la iniciativa de datos abiertos en Lyon se basan en entrevistas y análisis de plataforma. Nuestros hallazgos muestran que los actores de la sociedad civil en Lyon tienen la experiencia para crear conocimiento y servicios a partir de datos abiertos, pero no se apropian de éstos por la falta de canales de comunicación con los administradores de la plataforma. En consecuencia, discutimos las posibles modalidades de interacción y proponemos una agenda de investigación para comprender mejor la conexión entre las motivaciones individuales, el diseño de la plataforma de datos abiertos y los resultados societales. Les plateformes de données ouvertes sont largement adaptées dans les villes en promettant de stimuler l'économie et d’impliquer les citoyens. Cependant, les chercheurs ont attiré l'attention sur l'inefficacité de telles initiatives, si elles ne tiennent pas compte de l'écosystème d'acteurs. Toutefois, la revue de la littérature sur les données ouvertes montre une lacune dans l’analyse des motivations individuelles des acteurs, et en particulier des acteurs discrets de la société civile. En nous appuyant sur les études sur les motivations individuelles en gouvernement ouvert, nous proposons un modèle heuristique d'interconnexion entre les résultats sociétaux de l'open data et les motivations individuelles des acteurs.L’analyse de l'initiative et de l’écosystème de données ouvertes à Lyon repose sur des entretiens et l'analyse de la plateforme. Nos résultats montrent que les acteurs de la société civile à Lyon possèdent l'expertise nécessaire pour créer des connaissances et des services à partir de données ouvertes, mais ils ne parviennent pas à s’en approprier par le manque de canaux de communication avec les gestionnaires de plate-forme. Par conséquent, nous discutons les modalités possibles d’interaction et proposons des questions de recherche afin de mieux comprendre le lien entre les motivations individuelles, la conception d’une plate-forme de données ouvertes et les résultats sociétaux. Plataformas de dados abertos estão sendo amplamente adaptadas em cidades com a promessa de impulsionar a economia e empoderar os cidadãos. Entretanto, pesquisadores têm chamado atenção para a ineficácia dessas iniciativas, a menos que sejam projetadas levando em conta o contexto local e o ecosistemas de atores. Não obstante, uma revisão da literatura demonstra uma lacuna na abordagem às motivações dos atores e, em particular, atores discretos da sociedade civil ao usar os dados abertos. Com base em estudos de motivações individuais em um governo aberto, nós propomos um modelo heurístico de interconexão entre os resultados sociais dos dados abertos e as motivações individuais dos atores.A análise da iniciativa de dados abertos e do ecossistema em Lyon é baseada em entrevistas e análise de plataforma. Nossas descobertas mostram que atores da sociedade civil em Lyon têm o conhecimento para criar conhecimento e serviços a partir dos dados abertos, mas não conseguem se apropriar destes últimos por falta de canais de comunicação com os gerentes da plataforma. Partindo desta conclusão, discutimos possíveis modalidades de interação e propomos uma agenda de pesquisa futura para melhor compreender a conexão entre motivações individuais, desenho de plataformas de dados abertos, e resultados sociais mais amplos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio 2020-09-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/80740 10.15446/bitacora.v30n3.80740 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 30 Núm. 3 (2020): Ciudades Inteligentes- Actores sociales discretos; 55-70 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 30 No. 3 (2020): Ciudades Inteligentes- Actores sociales discretos; 55-70 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; v. 30 n. 3 (2020): Ciudades Inteligentes- Actores sociales discretos; 55-70 2027-145X 0124-7913 eng https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/80740/html https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/80740/pdf /*ref*/BATES, J. (2012). ““This is what modern deregulation looks like”: co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s Open Government Data Initiative”. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8 (2): 1-13. Retrieved from https://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/845 /*ref*/BERNERS-LEE, T. (2009). “Putting government data online”. Design Issues. Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/GovData.html /*ref*/COPAJA-ALEGRE, M. & ESPONDA-ALVA, C. (2019). “Tecnología e innovación hacia la ciudad inteligente. Avances, perspectivas y desafíos”. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 29 (2): 59-70. https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v29n2.68333 /*ref*/DANNEELS, L., VIAENE, S. & VAN DEN BERGH, J. (2017). “Open data platforms: Discussing alternative knowledge epistemologies”. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (3): 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.007 /*ref*/DAVIES, T. (2010). Open data, democracy and public sector: a look at open government data use from data.gov.uk. Oxford: University of Oxford, MSc Dissertation. /*ref*/DAWES, S., VIDIASOVA, L. & PARKHIMOVICH, O. (2016). “Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach”. Government Information Quarterly, 33 (1): 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003 /*ref*/EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT & COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2007). Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32007L0002 /*ref*/FERREIRA, G. & FARIAS, J. (2018). “The motivation to participate in citizen-sourcing and hackathons in the public sector”. Brazilian Administration Review, 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2018180006 /*ref*/GONZALEZ-ZAPATA, F. & HEEKS, R. (2015). “The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives”. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (4): 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.001 /*ref*/GRAND LYON. (2013). “Grand Lyon SmartData : nouvelles données disponibles et types de licences en décembre 2013”. Grand Lyon Économie. Retrieved from: https://www.economie.grandlyon.com/actualites/grand-lyon-smartdata-nouvelles-donnees-disponibles-et-types-de-licences-en-decembre-2013-1533.html /*ref*/GRAND LYON. (s.d.).https://data.beta.grandlyon.com/fr/recherche /*ref*/HARRISON, T., PARDO, T. & COOK, M. (2012). “creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda”. Future Internet, 4 (4): 900-928. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4040900 /*ref*/HUIJBOOM, N. & VAN DEN BROEK, T. (2011). “Open data: an international comparison of strategies”. European Journal of ePractice, 12 (1): 1-13. /*ref*/HUNTGEBURTH, J. & VEIT, D. (2013). “A research agenda for evaluating open government initiatives”. ECIS 2013 Completed Research, 112. Retrieved from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1335&context=ecis2013_cr /*ref*/JANSSEN, M., CHARALABIDIS, Y. & ZUIDERWIJK, A. (2012). “Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government”. Information Systems Management, 29: 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 /*ref*/JANUEL, C. (2018l). “La métropole de Lyon et les données personnelles(2)”. Millénaire 3. Retrieved from: https://www.millenaire3.com/Interview/La-metropole-de-Lyon-et-les-donnees-personnelles-2 /*ref*/JETZEK, T., AVITAL, M. & BJORN-ANDERSEN, N. (2013). “The generative mechanisms of open government data”. In: ECIS 2013 Proceedings. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems. /*ref*/JUELL-SKIELSE, G., et al. (2014). “Is the public motivated to engage in open data innovation?” In: M. Janssen, et al. (eds.), Electronic Government. EGOV 2014. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_23 /*ref*/LE CORF, J.-B. (2016). “Les pratiques d’innovation de services des développeurs web dans les territoires : le cas des projets Open Data”. Communication & Organisation, 50: 123-136. https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.5387 /*ref*/LINDERS, D. (2012). “From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media”. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (4): 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003 /*ref*/LOURENÇO, R. (2015). “An analysis of open government portals: a perspective of transparency for accountability”. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (3): 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006 /*ref*/MABI, C. (2015). “La plate-forme « data.gouv.fr » ou l’open data à la française”. Informations Sociales, 5 (191): 52-59. Retrieved from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-informations-sociales-2015-5-page-52.htm /*ref*/NAM, T. (2012). “Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0”. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (1): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005 /*ref*/OECD. (2001). Focus, 21. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/2536857.pdf /*ref*/OPEN KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION. (s.f.). Why open data? Retrieved from: https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/why-open-data/ /*ref*/ORSZAG, P. R. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Retrieved from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf /*ref*/POLLOCK, R. (2011). The present: a one-way street. Retrieved from: https://blog.okfn.org/2011/03/31/building-the-open-data-ecosystem/ /*ref*/REGGI, L. & DAWES, S. (2016). “Open government data ecosystems: linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability”. In: H. Scholl, et al. (eds.), Electronic Government. EGOV 2016. Guimarães: Springer, Cham, pp. 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_6 /*ref*/RUIJER, E., GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, S. & MEIJER, A. (2017). “Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use”. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (1): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001 /*ref*/SCHMIDTHUBER, L., et al. (2019). “Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation”. R & D Management, 49 (3): 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365 /*ref*/SIEBER, R. & JOHNSON, P. (2015). “Civic open data at a crossroads: dominant models and current challenges”. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (3): 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.003 /*ref*/TEAMOPENDATA.ORG. (2018). La clause share-a-like : un frein à l’innovation. Retrieved from: https://teamopendata.org/t/la-clause-share-a-like-un-frein-a-linnovation/428 /*ref*/TEAMOPENDATA.ORG. (2019). Nouveau portail open data de Lyon - version beta. Retrieved from: https://teamopendata.org/t/nouveau-portail-open-data-de-lyon-version- beta/1479 /*ref*/TUBA. (2019). Activity report 2017-2018. Lyon: TUBA. /*ref*/UBALDI, B. (2013). Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en /*ref*/VIALE PEREIRA, G., MACADAR, M. A. & GREGIANIN TESTA, M. (2015). “Delivery of public value to multiple stakeholders through open government data platforms”. In: E. Tambouris, et al. (eds.), Electronic government and electronic participation. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-570-8-91 /*ref*/WIJNHOVEN, F., EHRENHARD, M. & KUHN, J. (2015). “Open government objectives and participation motivations”. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (1): 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002 Derechos de autor 2020 Bitácora Urbano Territorial https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |