Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge

Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge

Design’s arguments of innovative transformation and its constant search for a preferred future have become a contemporary principle of the discipline, and yet most design models limit their process to the production of the next stage of incremental innovation. This approach to the future carries sig...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso, Ruecker, Stan
स्वरूप: Online
भाषा:eng
प्रकाशित: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio 2020
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/81801
टैग : टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
id oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-81801
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
collection OJS
language eng
format Online
author de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso
Ruecker, Stan
spellingShingle de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso
Ruecker, Stan
Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
author_facet de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso
Ruecker, Stan
author_sort de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso
title Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
title_short Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
title_full Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
title_fullStr Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge
title_sort using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. a proposed model for design research and knowledge
description Design’s arguments of innovative transformation and its constant search for a preferred future have become a contemporary principle of the discipline, and yet most design models limit their process to the production of the next stage of incremental innovation. This approach to the future carries significant systemic problems that can go from unexpected behavioral changes to unintended discrimination against certain groups, especially when addressing complex social problems and transformations. Avoiding these systemic problems might require the use of Design Research to study the conditions that produced them. However, design researchers seem to still disagree on the nature of Design Research, and the specific knowledge that can be produced through it. This paper seeks to introduce a possible model for design research that integrates various design theories to help obtain a more sophisticated view of the systemic situation of possible preferred futures. The goal of these process is to seek to produce a better understanding of how stakeholders envision their future, their intentions, values and needs as a systemic view within any given socio-technical system.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/81801
work_keys_str_mv AT delarosamunarjuanalfonso usingprototypestoproducehighresolutionsystemicfuturemapsaproposedmodelfordesignresearchandknowledge
AT rueckerstan usingprototypestoproducehighresolutionsystemicfuturemapsaproposedmodelfordesignresearchandknowledge
AT delarosamunarjuanalfonso usodeprototiposparaproducirmapasfuturossistemicosdealtaresolucionunapropuestademodeloparalainvestigacionyelconocimientoendiseno
AT rueckerstan usodeprototiposparaproducirmapasfuturossistemicosdealtaresolucionunapropuestademodeloparalainvestigacionyelconocimientoendiseno
AT delarosamunarjuanalfonso utiliserdesprototypespourproduiredescartessystemiquesahauteresolutiondufuturetudierlanaturedesconnaissancesgenereesparledesign
AT rueckerstan utiliserdesprototypespourproduiredescartessystemiquesahauteresolutiondufuturetudierlanaturedesconnaissancesgenereesparledesign
AT delarosamunarjuanalfonso usodeprototiposparaproduzirmapasfuturossistemicosdealtaresolucaoummodelopropostoparapesquisaeconhecimentoemdesign
AT rueckerstan usodeprototiposparaproduzirmapasfuturossistemicosdealtaresolucaoummodelopropostoparapesquisaeconhecimentoemdesign
_version_ 1709546727220969472
spelling oai:www.revistas.unal.edu.co:article-818012020-05-14T20:24:25Z Using prototypes to produce high-resolution systemic future maps. A proposed model for design research and knowledge Uso de prototipos para producir mapas futuros sistémicos de alta resolución. Una propuesta de modelo para la investigación y el conocimiento en diseño Utiliser des prototypes pour produire des cartes systémiques à haute résolution du futur: étudier la nature des connaissances générées par le design Uso de protótipos para produzir mapas futuros sistêmicos de alta resolução. Um modelo proposto para pesquisa e conhecimento em design de la Rosa Munar, Juan Alfonso Ruecker, Stan design research systems design value systems future studies methodology Design Future studies investigación de diseño diseño de sistemas sistemas de valores estudios futuros metodología Diseño Prospectiva recherche en design design de systèmes systèmes de valeur études futures méthodologie Design Prospective pesquisa em design design de sistemas sistemas de valor estudos futuros metodologia Design Estudo Prospectivo Design’s arguments of innovative transformation and its constant search for a preferred future have become a contemporary principle of the discipline, and yet most design models limit their process to the production of the next stage of incremental innovation. This approach to the future carries significant systemic problems that can go from unexpected behavioral changes to unintended discrimination against certain groups, especially when addressing complex social problems and transformations. Avoiding these systemic problems might require the use of Design Research to study the conditions that produced them. However, design researchers seem to still disagree on the nature of Design Research, and the specific knowledge that can be produced through it. This paper seeks to introduce a possible model for design research that integrates various design theories to help obtain a more sophisticated view of the systemic situation of possible preferred futures. The goal of these process is to seek to produce a better understanding of how stakeholders envision their future, their intentions, values and needs as a systemic view within any given socio-technical system. Los argumentos del diseño de transformación innovadora y búsqueda constante del futuro preferido se han convertido en un principio contemporáneo de la disciplina, sin embargo, la mayoría de los modelos de diseño limitan su proceso a la producción de la siguiente etapa de innovación incremental. Este enfoque hacia el futuro conlleva importantes  problemas sistémicos que pueden ir desde cambios de comportamiento inesperados hasta la discriminación involuntaria contra ciertos grupos, especialmente al abordar problemas y transformaciones sociales complejos. Evitar estos problemas sistémicos puede requerir el uso de la investigación en diseño para estudiar las condiciones que los produjeron. Sin embargo, los investigadores de diseño parecen estar aún en desacuerdo sobre la naturaleza de la investigación de diseño y el conocimiento específico que produce. Este artículo intenta presentar un modelo posible para la investigación de diseño que integre sus distintas teorías y ayude a obtener una visión más sofisticada del estado sistémico de futuros posibles preferidos. El objetivo de dicho proceso es producir una mejor comprensión de cómo las partes interesadas visualizan su futuro, intenciones, valores y necesidades como una mirada sistémica dentro de cualquier sistema sociotécnico dado. Les arguments de Design en matière de transformation innovante et de recherche constante d’un futur préféré sont devenus des principes de base contemporains de la discipline. Cependant, la plupart des modèles de conception limitent leur processus à la production de la prochaine étape des artefacts préexistants ou à la mise en œuvre d’un service linéaire. Cette vision de l’avenir comporte des problèmes systémiques importants qui peuvent aller de changements de comportement inattendus à une discrimination involontaire à l’encontre de certains groupes, en particulier lorsqu’il s’agit de problèmes et de transformations sociaux complexes. Une solution pour éviter ces problèmes systémiques consiste à utiliser Design Research pour étudier les conditions qui ont conduit à leur création. Cependant, après des décennies de discussions, les chercheurs en design semblent toujours être en désaccord sur la nature de la recherche en design et sur les connaissances spécifiques qui peuvent en résulter. Par conséquent, cet article cherche à introduire une série de connexions entre les théories de conception et un moyen possible pour ces théories de définir les bases d’un modèle aligné sur la nature de la conception. Le but de ces connexions est de chercher à produire une meilleure compréhension de l'idée d'avenir possible et de la manière dont nos valeurs et nos besoins sont interconnectés au sein d'un système sociotechnique donné. Os argumentos do design de transformação inovadora e sua constante busca por um futuro preferido tornaram-se um princípio contemporâneo da disciplina, e, no entanto, a maioria dos modelos de design limita seu processo à produção do próximo estágio da inovação incremental. Essa abordagem para o futuro carrega problemas sistêmicos significativos que podem passar de mudanças comportamentais inesperadas a discriminação não intencional contra certos grupos, especialmente quando se trata de problemas e transformações sociais complexas. Evitar esses problemas sistêmicos pode exigir o uso da Pesquisa de Projeto para estudar as condições que os produziram. No entanto, os pesquisadores de design ainda parecem discordar da natureza da Pesquisa de Design e do conhecimento específico que pode ser produzido através dela. Este artigo procura introduzir um possível modelo de pesquisa em design que integre várias teorias de design para ajudar a obter uma visão mais sofisticada da situação sistêmica de possíveis futuros preferidos. O objetivo desse processo é buscar uma melhor compreensão de como as partes interessadas visualizam seu futuro,  suas intenções, valores e necessidades como uma visão sistêmica em qualquer sistema sócio-técnico. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Artes - Instituto de Investigaciones Hábitat, Ciudad & Territorio 2020-05-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo de reflexión científica Theoretical/scientific reflection réflexion scientifique reflexão científica application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/81801 10.15446/bitacora.v30n2.81801 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): Diseño Incluyente; 87-100 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): Diseño Incluyente; 87-100 Bitácora Urbano Territorial; v. 30 n. 2 (2020): Diseño Incluyente; 87-100 2027-145X 0124-7913 eng https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/81801/pdf https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/bitacora/article/view/81801/html /*ref*/ALEXANDER, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. /*ref*/ARCHER, L. B. (1981). “A view of the nature of the design research”. In: R. Jacques & J. A. Powell (eds.), Design: science: method. Guildford: IPC Business Press, pp, 30-47. /*ref*/BANATHY, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Springer. /*ref*/BAYAZIT, N. (2004). “Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research”. Design Issues, 20 (1): 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739 /*ref*/BERTALANFFY, L. von, (1968). General system theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller. /*ref*/BIJL-BROUWER, M. van der. (2019). “Problem framing expertise in public and social innovation”. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5 (1): 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.003 /*ref*/BØDKER, S. (1987). “Prototyping revisited - design with users in a cooperative setting”. DAIMI PB, 233: 1-26. /*ref*/BØDKER, S. (1998). “Understanding representation in design”. Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (2): 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1302_1 /*ref*/BROWN, T. & WYATT, J. (2010). “Design thinking for social innovation”. Development Outreach, 12 (1): 29-43. Retrieved from: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/213798-1278955272198/Design_Thinking_for_SocialInnovation2.pdf /*ref*/BUCHANAN, R. (2001). “Design research and the new learning”. Design Issues, 17 (4): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056 /*ref*/CROSS, N. (2001). “Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science”. Design Issues, 17 (3): 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196 /*ref*/DE LA ROSA, J. (2017). “Prototyping the non-existent as a way to research and innovate: a proposal for a possible framework for design research and innovation”. The Design Journal, 20 (sup 1): S4468-S4476. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352943 /*ref*/DE LA ROSA, J., KOHLER, K. & RUECKER, S. (2016). “Prototyping as a resource to investigate future states of the system”. Oslo, proceedings of the RSD6, Emerging contexts for Systems Perspectives in Design. Retrieved from: https://systemic-design.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/RSD6-dlaRosaKohlerRuecker-1.pdf /*ref*/EDELENBOS, J. (1999). “Design and management of participatory public policy making”. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 1 (4): 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719039900000027 /*ref*/EDMONDS, B. M. (1999). Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester: University of Manchester. /*ref*/ESCOBAR, A. (1992). “Reflections on ‘development’: grassroots approaches and alternative politics in the Third World”. Futures, 24 (5): 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(92)90014-7 /*ref*/FASTE, T. & FASTE, H. (2012). “Demystifying'design research': design is not research, research is design”. Boston, paper presented at the IDSA Education Symposium. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6961/5f9130a93c129fa2f3acbb8ff2f145b49660.pdf /*ref*/FINDELI, A. (2004). “La recherche-projet : une méthode pour la recherche en design”. Bâle, paper presented at the Symposium de Recherche sur le Design. /*ref*/FORLANO, L. & MATHEW, A. (2014). “From design fiction to design friction: speculative and participatory design of values-embedded urban technology”. Journal of Urban Technology, 21 (4): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971525 /*ref*/FRAYLING, C. (1993). Research in art and design. London: Royal College of Art. /*ref*/GALEY, A. & RUECKER, S. (2010). “How a prototype argues”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25 (4): 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq021 /*ref*/GALLAGHER, S. (2010). “Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception”. Topoi, 29 (2): 183-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-010-9079-y /*ref*/HALLAM, J. C., et al. (1994). “Behaviour: perception, action and intelligence-the view from situated robotics [and discussion]”. Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering, 349 (1689): 29-42. /*ref*/HANCOCK, T. & BEZOLD, C. (1994). “Possible futures, preferable futures. Healthcare Forum Journal, 37 (2): 23-9. /*ref*/IRANI, M. & PELEG, S. (1990). “Super resolution from image sequences”. Atlantic City, proceedings or the 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.1990.119340 /*ref*/IRWIN, T., KOSSOFF, G. & TONKINWISE, C. (2015). “Transition design provocation”. Design Philosophy Papers, 13 (1): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688 /*ref*/ISKANDER, N. (2018, September 5). “Design thinking is fundamentally conservative and preserves the Status Quo”. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2018/09/design-thinking-is-fundamentally-conservative-and-preserves-the-status-quo /*ref*/JONES, P. H. (2014). “Systemic design principles for complex social systems”. In: G. S. Metcalf (ed.), Social systems and design. Tokyo: Springer, pp. 91-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4 /*ref*/KIMBELL, L. (2015). Applying design approaches to policy making: discovering policy lab. Brighton: University of Brighton. Retrieved from: https://researchingdesignforpolicy.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/kimbell_policylab_report.pdf /*ref*/LATOUR, B. (1990). “Technology is society made durable”. The Sociological Review, 38 (sup 1): 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x /*ref*/MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1996). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. /*ref*/MURATOVSKI, G. (2015). Research for designers: a guide to methods and practice. London: Sage. /*ref*/NELSON, H. G. & STOLTERMAN, E. (2003). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications. /*ref*/POLANYI, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday. /*ref*/SEVALDSON, B. (2011). “GIGA-Mapping: visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design”. Nordes, 4. Retrieved from: https://archive.nordes.org/index.php/n13/article/view/104/88 /*ref*/SEVALDSON, B. (2017). “Redesigning systems thinking”. FormAkademisk - Research Journal of Design and Design Education, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1755 /*ref*/SIMON, H. (1969). The science of the artificial. Cambridge: Cambridge Press. /*ref*/VERGANTI, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press. /*ref*/VOROS, J. (2003). “A generic foresight process framework”. Foresight, 5 (3): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379 /*ref*/ZAMENOPOULOS, T. & ALEXIOU, K. (2007). “Towards an anticipatory view of design”. Design Studies, 28 (4): 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.001 Derechos de autor 2020 Bitácora Urbano Territorial https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

समान संसाधन