Neurath y Van Eesteren

We analyze the relationship between Neurath and the IV CIAM, about the attempts to unify the language of urban planning. We compare the Neurath's method of pictorial statistics with the criteria of urban representation supported by Van Eesteren. We evaluate the merits of both proposals and try...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Prono, Prof. María Inés, Aimino, Arq. Matías
Natura: Online
Lingua:spa
Pubblicazione: Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2012
Accesso online:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/931
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne! !
id ojs-article-931
record_format ojs
spelling ojs-article-9312021-07-13T14:45:30Z Neurath y Van Eesteren Neurath and Van Eesteren Prono, Prof. María Inés Aimino, Arq. Matías We analyze the relationship between Neurath and the IV CIAM, about the attempts to unify the language of urban planning. We compare the Neurath's method of pictorial statistics with the criteria of urban representation supported by Van Eesteren. We evaluate the merits of both proposals and try to show that the differences concerning representation methods refer to a wider field of philosophical and ideological disagreements. Se analiza la relación de Neurath con el IV CIAM en lo referente a los intentos de unificación del lenguaje de la planificación urbana. Se contrasta el método de estadística pictórica de Neurath con los criterios de representación urbana sostenidos por Van Eesteren. Se evalúan los méritos de ambas propuestas y se intenta mostrar que las diferencias con respecto a los métodos de representación remiten a un ámbito más vasto de desacuerdos filosóficos e ideológicos. Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2012-12-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo application/pdf application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/931 10.14409/ar.v1i2.931 ARQUISUR Revista; Vol. 2 Núm. 2: ARQUISUR REVISTA (DIC. 2012); 36-51 ARQUISUR; Vol 2 No 2: ARQUISUR REVISTA (DIC. 2012); 36-51 2250-4206 1853-2365 10.14409/ar.v1i2 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/931/1385 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/931/1392 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Prono, Prof. María Inés
Aimino, Arq. Matías
spellingShingle Prono, Prof. María Inés
Aimino, Arq. Matías
Neurath y Van Eesteren
author_facet Prono, Prof. María Inés
Aimino, Arq. Matías
author_sort Prono, Prof. María Inés
title Neurath y Van Eesteren
title_short Neurath y Van Eesteren
title_full Neurath y Van Eesteren
title_fullStr Neurath y Van Eesteren
title_full_unstemmed Neurath y Van Eesteren
title_sort neurath y van eesteren
description We analyze the relationship between Neurath and the IV CIAM, about the attempts to unify the language of urban planning. We compare the Neurath's method of pictorial statistics with the criteria of urban representation supported by Van Eesteren. We evaluate the merits of both proposals and try to show that the differences concerning representation methods refer to a wider field of philosophical and ideological disagreements.
publisher Universidad Nacional del Litoral
publishDate 2012
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/931
work_keys_str_mv AT pronoprofmariaines neurathyvaneesteren
AT aiminoarqmatias neurathyvaneesteren
AT pronoprofmariaines neurathandvaneesteren
AT aiminoarqmatias neurathandvaneesteren
_version_ 1709459978318774272