Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975):
The state promotion of Argentine architectural and infrastructure works in the "long 1960s" was linked to recognizable demands that emerge from territorial and economic planning. The deepening of the industrialization process implied an energy self-sufficiency country, fluent communication...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Online |
| Hizkuntza: | spa |
| Argitaratua: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2020
|
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/9491 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| id |
ojs-article-9491 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
ojs-article-94912021-02-18T20:31:18Z Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): Arquitectura e infraestructura para el desarrollo en Argentina (1960-1975) Costa, Camila The state promotion of Argentine architectural and infrastructure works in the "long 1960s" was linked to recognizable demands that emerge from territorial and economic planning. The deepening of the industrialization process implied an energy self-sufficiency country, fluent communication between production centers and the newly created provincial states, as well as the construction industrialization. These aspects had an impact on the creation and development of various construction programs. However, this article reviews the literature around three specific programs: industry, energy and territorial connections, for considering them fundamental and synergistic within the industrialization process in its second phase. In the disciplinary gaze on the object of study, politics and economics agree quite a bit on the conceptualization of the period, planning incorporates the notion of imbalance characterizing the Argentine territory, and from architecture the works have been approached only in terms of search for national identity and modern style questions. This work allows us to point out that the theoretical construction revolves around the notions of: developmentalism as a theoretical model, territory as geographical space and place of power, planning as a priority discipline at the time and architecture for progress as a concept under construction. La promoción estatal de obras de arquitectura e infraestructura argentinas en la “larga década de 1960” se vinculó a demandas reconocibles que emergen de la planificación territorial y económica. La profundización del proceso de industrialización implicó para el país la autosuficiencia energética, la comunicación fluida entre centros productivos y los recientemente creados Estados provinciales, así como la industrialización de la construcción. Estos aspectos repercutieron en la creación y desarrollo de diversos programas constructivos. Sin embargo, este artículo revisa la literatura en torno a tres programas específicos: industria, energía y conexiones territoriales, por considerarlos fundamentales y sinérgicos dentro del proceso de industrialización en su segunda fase. En la mirada disciplinar sobre el objeto de estudio, la política y la economía acuerdan bastante en la conceptualización del período, la planificación incorpora la noción de desequilibrio caracterizando al territorio argentino, y desde la arquitectura las obras se han abordado sólo en términos de búsqueda de identidad nacional y de cuestionamientos al estilo moderno. Este trabajo permite señalar que la construcción teórica gira en torno a las nociones de: desarrollismo como modelo teórico, territorio como espacio geográfico y lugar de poder, planificación como disciplina prioritaria en la época y arquitectura para el desarrollo como concepto en construcción. Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2020-12-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo texto con imágenes application/pdf application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/9491 10.14409/ar.v10i18.9491 ARQUISUR Revista; Vol. 10 Núm. 18: ARQUISUR REVISTA (DIC. 2020); 92-105 ARQUISUR; Vol 10 No 18: ARQUISUR REVISTA (DIC. 2020); 92-105 2250-4206 1853-2365 10.14409/ar.v10i18 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/9491/13332 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/9491/13324 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Derechos de autor 2020 ARQUISUR Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Costa, Camila |
| spellingShingle |
Costa, Camila Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| author_facet |
Costa, Camila |
| author_sort |
Costa, Camila |
| title |
Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| title_short |
Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| title_full |
Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| title_fullStr |
Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Architecture and infrastructure for progress in Argentina (1960-1975): |
| title_sort |
architecture and infrastructure for progress in argentina (1960-1975): |
| description |
The state promotion of Argentine architectural and infrastructure works in the "long 1960s" was linked to recognizable demands that emerge from territorial and economic planning. The deepening of the industrialization process implied an energy self-sufficiency country, fluent communication between production centers and the newly created provincial states, as well as the construction industrialization. These aspects had an impact on the creation and development of various construction programs. However, this article reviews the literature around three specific programs: industry, energy and territorial connections, for considering them fundamental and synergistic within the industrialization process in its second phase. In the disciplinary gaze on the object of study, politics and economics agree quite a bit on the conceptualization of the period, planning incorporates the notion of imbalance characterizing the Argentine territory, and from architecture the works have been approached only in terms of search for national identity and modern style questions. This work allows us to point out that the theoretical construction revolves around the notions of: developmentalism as a theoretical model, territory as geographical space and place of power, planning as a priority discipline at the time and architecture for progress as a concept under construction. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/ARQUISUR/article/view/9491 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT costacamila architectureandinfrastructureforprogressinargentina19601975 AT costacamila arquitecturaeinfraestructuraparaeldesarrolloenargentina19601975 |
| _version_ |
1709459980854231040 |