For what reason the history?
If to establish specific methods for the study of the History or of the histories, it has frustrated, before to stimulate new intents of understanding approach of their reason, then it is convenient to revise the theoretical context in which the contemporary tendencies are debated about the possibil...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Online |
| Язык: | spa |
| Опубликовано: |
Universidad Católica de Colombia
2006
|
| Online-ссылка: | https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/805 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| Итог: | If to establish specific methods for the study of the History or of the histories, it has frustrated, before to stimulate new intents of understanding approach of their reason, then it is convenient to revise the theoretical context in which the contemporary tendencies are debated about the possibility of finding historical truths. This text looks for, as objective, to schematize this context, starting from some basic questions: the necessity that exists inevitably, or not, of a method in the research and the teaching of the History of the Architecture; the existence, or not, of cognoscible laws so that this method is applicable; the necessity to reread, or not, the histories that have been written, with or without the resource of a method; and, as conclusion, the historian’s responsibility to maintain a serious and critical “revisionist” posture to avoid the noxious arguments that, nevertheless, have been presented as unquestionable. |
|---|