ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?

Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relations...

Ful tanımlama

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yazar: Fonti, Diego
Materyal Türü: Online
Dil:spa
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2017
Online Erişim:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
Diğer Bilgiler
Özet:Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed