ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relations...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Online |
| Hizkuntza: | spa |
| Argitaratua: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
2017
|
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| Gaia: | Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed |
|---|